The Scotsman

Pandemic pragmatism is proving to be key in resolving family law cases

A year of lockdown has left many clients determined to ‘make up for lost time’, which means they are far more ready to compromise, writes David Coutts

-

The pandemic has wrought seismic changes on family life – and delivered an unexpected consequenc­e in the way many couples are approachin­g the issue of separation or divorce.

For many people, enforced time at home has been beneficial, particular­ly for those rediscover­ing the joys of spending more time with their children. But for every such case, there is a counter story – one where lockdown has been the final straw in an already fractured relationsh­ip.

That’s where I am seeing a transforma­tion in how couples are dealing with such relationsh­ip breakdowns. A year of lock down has left many determined to “make up for lost time ”, which means they are far more ready to compromise.

Previously it was more common to see divorces approached on an “entitlemen­t” basis. Once property, pensions and other assets had been totted up, parties would be determined to exact their full entitlemen­t.

Now there is a change in mindset and a focus on pragmatism and problem-solving. People are far more aware that time is precious and they are ready to accept a little less in their financial settlement if it means a faster resolution. They want to get on with living.

Whether this is a long-term shift in attitudes, we’ll wait and see. But what is clear tome is that the pandemicha­s bee na na cc el er ant for all sorts of other changes in family law and beyond.

The role of a lawyer remains to advise clients of their legal claims and rights. However, clients now want things done differentl­y and to have greater control of the process.

For me, three key themes are now front of mind for clients: cost, responsive­ness and efficiency. While those considerat­ions have been ever-present, they are now more pertinent than ever.

During lockdown, we’ve grown accustomed to convenienc­e and commerce at our fingertips. Businesses­have had to adapt to survive. We all know which pandemic shopping or customer service experience­s we would recommend, and those we will never use again. family law is no different.

At Simpson & Marwick, our constant focus is on more innovative ways to provide clients with a high-quality, value for money service. Technology is at the forefront of that. We have taken the time to understand how clients want to communicat­e with their lawyers. Some prefer face-to-face or email, while others want to use instant messaging apps.we’ ve createdpla­tforms for our clients to get responsive and effective communicat­ion–when they need it.

Everyone now expects to be able to track their online deliveries. likewise, clients want to know the status of their case at anytime. Going days or even weeks with no update from your lawyer is no longer accepted.

When it comes to costs, clients are often faced with intimidati­ng hourly rates and given no idea how many hours their case may entail. This isn’ t helped by the fact that significan­t legal fees are incurred by time-consuming internal processes and dated systems. Everything our firm does is aimed at removing or streamlini­ng those processes. This makes the process quicker and reduces costs for clients.

It’s not possible to predict fees in every case, but we must become more transparen­t. That doesn’t mean spending less time in contact with the client to reduce the hours “clocked”. In family law, clients should not feel apprehensi­on when contacting their lawyer for advice. We should be affable and accessible.

We have looked at ourselves first and assessed what we, as the service provider, can do differentl­y.

The pandemic has helped deliver proof that this approach works – evident in the fact that we now have clients, all over scotland, with whom we have built strong and healthy relationsh­ips without ever having met face-to-face.

David Coutts is the newlyappoi­nted Head of Family Law with Simpson & Marwick

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom