The Scotsman

Inquiry finds fatal Carmont crash was caused by wrongly built drain

- By ALASTAIR DALTON adalton@scotsman.com

Network Rail was today accused of the "very definition of negligence" after official investigat­ors said a wrongly built drainage trench caused the fatal Carmont train derailment in Aberdeensh­ire.

Lawyers for relatives of victims of the August 2020 crash said the final Rail Accident Investigat­ion Branch (RAIB) report "clearly shows rail management had prior knowledge of several known risks – they were told to improve, yet still failed to act".

Three people – driver Brett Mccullough, conductor Donald Dinnie and passenger Christophe­r Stuchbury – were killed and the other six people on the train were injured when it hit debris washed from the drain onto the track after intense rainfall.

Scotrail said pre-pandemic, the 6:38am Aberdeen-glasgow service would have carried 25-30 passengers – up to six times as many – and the RAIB said “the casualty toll would almost certainly have been significan­tly higher”.

Train drivers’ union Aslef said failures highlighte­d in the report amounted to a “watershed moment for rail safety” and decried “endemic and tragic corporate failure“.

It called for the resignatio­n of Scotland’s Railway managing director Alex Hynes, who

oversees Scotrail and Network Rail Scotland, and the withdrawal of the 40-yearold train fleet involved by the third anniversar­y of the crash next year.

RAIB said it did not regard the Inter7city “High Speed Trains” as “unsafe”, but “the outcome would have been better” if they had complied with modern crashworth­iness standards.

However, among 20 safety recommenda­tions, it called for modificati­ons to older trains to improve protection for passengers and crew, and improvemen­ts to the way Network Rail handled extreme weather, as well as better management of lineside drainage.

A separate, joint investigat­ion by Police Scotland, British Transport Police and the Office of Rail and Road is continuing,

whose report will be submitted to the Crown Office.

The RAIB said nearly a month’s rain fell in three hours before the crash “but the drainage system and associated earthworks had not been constructe­d in accordance with the original design and so were not able to safely accommodat­e the water flows".

A bund, or earth bank, had been added, which funnelled water towards the drain, which became inundated and washed gravel onto the line.

The RAIB said if the drain had been built as designed “it would have been capable of safely accommodat­ing the flow of surface water that occurred on the morning of August 12, 2020, without causing gravel to be washed away down the steeply sloping trench towards the track”.

The drain was built in 2011-12 by Carillion, which went into liquidatio­n six years later.

The firm failed to inform Network Rail it was adding the bund to the system.

Investigat­ors also found no evidence that Network Rail carried out any inspection of the upper parts of the drainage system between when it viewed the completed work in 2013 and the crash.

They said the UK Government-owned company failed to add that section to an internal programme that would have triggered routine inspection­s and maintenanc­e.

RAIB chief inspector of rail accidents Simon French said he hoped the episode “will resonate throughout the UK’S constructi­on industry”.

He said: “It is so sad that a project that was designed for the protection of the travelling public became unsuitable for its intended use and posed a hazard to trains because of such uncontroll­ed changes to the design.”

The investigat­ion also found the driver had not been instructed to drive at lower speed despite other flooding and landslips in the area – a policy that has since changed.

The train, which had been ordered to return to Stonehaven after being halted by a landslip, was running at 73mph – near the speed limit for that section of line – when it derailed and then hit a bridge parapet, which caused the carriages to “scatter”.

Mr French said the railways must get “even smarter” about the way they countered the threat of extreme weather and better exploit technology that predicted and tracked storms.

He also called for more research on how trains could be kept in line rather than jackknifin­g in crashes, and “to think about the longer-term implicatio­ns of continuing to operate rolling stock that predates modern standards”.

Neil Davidson, partner at Digby Brown Solicitors, which represents several of the victims' families, said: “This is a damning report which highlights a catalogue of failures within Network Rail.

“The investigat­ion clearly shows rail management had prior knowledge of several known risks – they were told to improve, yet still failed to act.

“This is the very definition of negligence.”

Kevin Lindsay, Scottish organiser of Aslef, called for a public inquiry.

He said: “The failures identified in this report are so bad that we believe this must be a watershed moment for rail safety across the UK.

“Never again should our drivers be on trains where crashworth­iness is not fit for purpose."

 ?? ?? The train hit the parapet of a bridge after derailing on debris
The train hit the parapet of a bridge after derailing on debris
 ?? ?? Part of the wreckage of the train after the derailment
Part of the wreckage of the train after the derailment

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom