Moths disappearing faster from woodland habitat
Moth numbers have declined more in UK woodlands over the last half century than in any other habitat, according to a new study.
Forest populations halved during 1968-2016 compared to average national losses of a third
A team of scientists led from Rothamsted Research found that populations have more thanhalvedinbroadleafwoodland,comparedtoaveragelosses of 34 per cent across the rest of the country.
Habitat loss, pesticides and urban light pollution have all been implicated in insect declines, but the new results show the greatest losses are occurring in broadleaf woodland, a UK habitat type that in fact increased in area during the study period and is relatively shielded from the effects of chemical and light pollution.
Broadleaf woodlands are often less intensively managed and avoid the chemical pitfalls of commercial plantations which are often sprayed with insecticide.
The authors say the reasons for the declines are still unknown, but climate change may play a role.
Lead author, Dr Dan Blumgart said: “Climate change is known to have contributed to the national decline in moths and it is likely that this has driven at least part of the decline observed in woodlands.
“But this can’t explain why the declines have been worse in broadleaf woodland compared to other habitats. We might expect the shade provided by woodlands to help buffer against the effects of climate change, but that is clearly not the case.”
Based on data from more than 400 species and over eight million individual moths, the study looked at four indicators of moth population health over 49 years.
The team measured species richness, which is a measure of the number of species, and species diversity, which takes into account the number of species present as well as how many individuals of each species there are.
Broadleaf woodland was the only habitat in which all four measures declined severely, with abundance down 51 per cent,biomassdown52percent, species richness down 14 per cent,andspeciesdiversitydown 15percent.thiscontrastedwith smaller nationwide declines in abundance (34 per cent) and biomass (39 per cent), whil e species richness didn’t change.