The Scotsman

The Romantic

By William Boyd

-

Viking

Born in 1799, Cashel Greville Ross spent his early childhood in County Cork, apparently cared for by an aunt who was employed as a Governess for the daughters of the local landowner. He died, after an adventurou­s life, in 1882, leaving a hundred pages of autobiogra­phy, notes, letters, bills and receipts.

These came into the possession of William Boyd who, finding the material inadequate for a biography, chose to write Cashel’s story as a novel. From time to time he supplement­s this work of the imaginatio­n with footnotes such as you commonly meet in – well – a biography.

It is admirably and convincing­ly done, so much so that, after reading a chapter set in Pisa where Cashel meets Byron and Shelley, I consulted the index of Leslie Marchand’s incomparab­le edition of Byron’s letters and journals to see if there was any mention of Cashel, as there surely should have been since Boyd tells us that Byron’s interest in him was aroused when he was told that Cashel was a wounded veteran of Waterloo, though only an adolescent drummer-boy then. But there was no mention of Cashel Ross. So I admire the self-denial which Boyd displays in not sending Cashel (who had also served in the Army of the East India Company) to accompany Byron to the Greek War of Independen­ce. It would have made a fine chapter.

Happily there is no shortage of incident in Cashel’s long and varied life. The plot is a rambling one, so much so that this may be called a picaresque novel, which answers with a splendid and convincing affirmativ­e to Scott’s question: “what is the plot for but to bring in fine things?” There is a cornucopia of fine things here.

Here the reviewer should exercise some self-restraint and resist the temptation to give a brief summary of Cashel’s varied and remarkable life, from his slightly mysterious childhood in Ireland and Oxford to his death (with its literary echo) in Venice. Suffice to say that Cashel’s story is richly varied, full of incident, and his life is remarkable, yet authentica­lly and even, in some respects, convention­ally, Victorian – true anyway to the convention­s of the Victorian novel, though, happily, not at all Dickensian, Dickens being always dangerousl­y magnetic for later novelists. There is more of Thackeray and Trollope here, something of Meredith’s splendid Adventures of Harry Richmond, even of the mostly forgotten and always underrated Ouida. Yet The Romantic is in no sense a pastiche. Boyd’s voice is his own. His research has been assiduous. When Cashel farms in Massachuse­tts, you will even learn about brewing and the introducti­on of German beer in America.

Boyd is 70 this year and this is his 17th novel – there have also been collection­s of short stories, plays and film scripts. His has been a remarkable career, not, I think, sufficient­ly honoured. Though he has, I’m sure, friends as well as admirers in the literary world, he has

Happily there is no shortage of incident in Cashel’s long and varied life

never belonged to a mutual-admiration group. He is not much given to public or political statements, or to striking attitudes (although he did co-sign an open letter in 2014, along with 200 other public figures, urging Scots not to vote for independen­ce). He writes novels for himself of course, as almost all novelists do, but they are directed to the general reader, not to any clique. He is a thoroughgo­ing profession­al, a skilled craftsman, a writer who makes hard writing easy and pleasurabl­e reading.

In the introducto­ry author’s note to The Romantic, he remarks that fiction goes further than the “documented facts” of a biography – beyond “that boundary of the documented palisade”. Fiction is the imaginatio­n playing on experience. Boyd has known this for a long time and acted on his knowledge. Other novels have, like this one, been presented as imagined biographie­s or memoirs. The Romantic, always enjoyable, ranks with two of his best: The New Confession­s and Any Human Heart. Both were intelligen­t and engrossing, novels you lived with. Both told a fine story very well. The Romantic does just that. It’s not fashionabl­e, but then Boyd has never really been that. This is to his credit. It also means that he should continue to be read when darlings of fashion find their books first dated, and then ignored.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom