The Scotsman

Appliance By JO Morgan

Jonathan Cape

-

Although JO Morgan has had a great deal of success as a poet, this is his first novel by a major publisher. A question that might flit across the brain is “Is this a novel?” It has 11 chapters, in prose, and a narrative that begins and ends. But in each section we have different protagonis­ts, and there is only one constant: a machine. In terms of plot arc, forget about the fleeting humans because the real story is about how the technology is changing, adapting, morphing, growing and in its own way distorting us. It is the Bindungsro­man of something inhuman, and it is terrifying.

It begins by wrong-footing the reader. Instead of a science-fiction set-up, we arrive in a dreary and weary suburban scene. The style chimed with various dramatic works I love – the early Pinter of The Birthday Party, Ayckbourn’s Absurd Person Singular or NF Simpson’s One Way Pendulum. Here we have the pompous Mr

Pearson and his tetchy wife Mrs Pearson – neither of whom have forenames – and the arrival of the appliance. Mr Pearson works in Personnel and is delighted to have been chosen to trial the new thing. It unsettles, confuses and bemuses them both; and the reader is drawn in to wondering what the contraptio­n is, and what it does. Their relationsh­ip is sketched with acid precision: he is blustering­ly confident, she is taciturn and subversive. The denouement comes, and it is a masterpiec­e of bathos; in that a plastic spoon that wasn’t in the machine now is in the machine. And then it has gone again. The company Mr Pearson drudges for seems to be on the verge of creating a device that can (not instantane­ously, at this stage), transport matter. That he works in Personnel is a very knowing touch. “Human Resources” might have been too blatant, but the human and the nonhuman have had their first collision.

As the book progresses we get snapshots of lives as the technology advances, from the first human trial subject, to the man who devised the transporte­r wondering how much else it might do, to the journalist who thinks the system may be concealing a flaw, to the schoolboy who finds the error in the code, to much (and comical, and horrible) embarrassm­ent. The idea of the philosophi­cal novel is often seen as pretentiou­s, and Morgan’s skill is that in each brief vignette we come to have an affective relationsh­ip with those dealing with this paradigm shift in human behaviour and interactio­n. Some are truly shocking, some are absurdly tender. All of them, as if the reader were in an opticians, take different lenses to the eye and ask, “Better or worse?”

The idea of perfect replicatio­n is not new, nor are the philosophi­cal problems surroundin­g it. One chapter has an elderly woman transporti­ng her belongings to a new home and poses a fundamenta­l question: is what arrives what was sent, or a copy of it? This is not a new or original thought. Walter Benjamin fretted about it in “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproducti­on”, Star Trek’s Dr Mccoy was famously wary about using a transporte­r, and numerous plots involved the implicatio­n of taking something apart and putting it back together.

Morgan’s real skill is in finding the poetry of the conundrum – he nearly sidesteps the science-y bits with an eerie meeting with someone who knows more than they let on: the problem is not that it works, the problem is that it doesn’t not work. An Egyptian could construct a right angled triangle with 12 knots on a rope, but it needs a Pythagoras to realise that the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the opposite two sides.

Morgan insists in this fable-like, compelling novel on the groundedne­ss of being, of the reality of the here being here and the now being now. Although an air of elegy permeates the book, there is a sense of resilient triumph: humanity, encroached on by its own ingenuity, persists. At the end one character says, in relation to accelerati­on of developmen­t: “Why’d they want do a thing like that?” and the reply comes “Just saying as they could”. It’s the “because it’s there” argument for mountain climbing or reaching the magnetic south. Maybe, Morgan suggests, just let it be. We are too intrusive on reality.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom