The Scottish Farmer

Don’t rush into carbon credit deals

-

RUSHING in to ‘loosely worded’ carbon credit deals could cost land managers financiall­y in the long-run.

Legal firm, Lindsays, has warned that the rising tide of Scottish landowners keen to capitalise on carbon credit trading risk being ‘blindsided’ by quick deals which will ultimately mean others reap greater benefits than them.

The Edinburgh-headquarte­red firm has identified loopholes in deals where firms are using tree planting and peatland restoratio­n to help achieve net-zero, including long term obligation­s for landowners ‘for generation­s to come’ and risks to investors from non-compliance with the silvicultu­ral management requiremen­ts.

Senior associate in the rural team at Lindsays, Tim Macdonald, said: “There’s a lot of pressure on agricultur­e to reduce emissions and to diversify incomes, so it can be tempting to jump quickly at opportunit­ies to trade certain land-based activities which sequester carbon in exchange for incentives from those looking to offset their own emissions.

“What’s becoming increasing­ly clear to us, though, is that patience is required when putting agreements in place,” said Mr Macdonald. “Selling land or carbon units too quickly in the life of the project could allow someone else to reap the benefit of higher values, so you will need insightful guidance on the best time to sell – or the details you would be best advised putting in place to protect your longerterm interests.

“For example, landowners must enter into a Carbon Unit Agreement with buyers, exposing them to onerous obligation­s, which could tie them and their successors to managing land as forestry to the exclusion of other developmen­t for in excess of 100 years.”

Lindsays are also encouragin­g landowners not to overlook the potential of peatlands in diversifyi­ng their businesses, and the use of traditiona­l grazing ground, with land prices remaining high.

“Though grant funding for peatland restoratio­n is available across the UK, it’s private capital that’s turning many landowners’ thoughts to the ground beneath their feet,” said Mr Macdonald. “They’re looking to exploit the dual financial and climate benefits made possible by peatland restoratio­n.

“Though the carbon market is in its early days in Scotland, there’s significan­t appetite from investors, including corporatio­ns looking to offset their carbon footprint.

“As well as offering opportunit­ies to sell carbon units, peatland restoratio­n will increase the value of the land itself. And, of course, there are environmen­tal benefits to pursue, including improved water quality, flood management and biodiversi­ty as well as carbon sequestrat­ion.”

According to NatureScot, more than 20% of Scotland is covered by peat, 80% of which is damaged – leading the Scottish Government to devote £250m to peatland restoratio­n up to 2030.

While peatland restoratio­n is neither quick nor technicall­y simple, that government support, a developing financial market with strong corporate interest, and a tried and tested mechanism for benchmarki­ng standards and financial returns – the Peatland Code – makes it an attractive option for estate owners and land managers.

 ?? ?? TIM MACDONALD of legal firm Lindsays
TIM MACDONALD of legal firm Lindsays

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom