The Scottish Mail on Sunday

Would you have the baby screening test that could wipe out every genetic defect?

- By Jo Macfarlane

ABLOOD test that can screen an unborn child for all known genetic abnormalit­ies – and may even be able to diagnose previously unknown ones – is to be offered to pregnant women by a private British clinic from next week.

Hailed as the most advanced foetal DNA test ever, the analysis will cost from £900 and the US-based manufactur­ers claim trials have proven it is as accurate as the current best, and more invasive, tests offered on the NHS.

The MaterniT GENOME test can also be offered from ten weeks, whereas NHS pre-natal screening starts at 11 weeks. This involves an ultrasound scan that may flag up physical signs for concern, and other blood tests, after which other more invasive diagnostic tests may be carried out.

The human genome – the DNA code inside every cell that contains the ‘programme’ for all our characteri­stics – has 46 chromosome­s. Genetic abnormalit­ies occur when part of a chromosome is damaged or missing, or when extra copies of the chromosome are present. More than half of all miscarriag­es in the early stages are due to such faults.

Birth defects affect approximat­ely one in every 46 babies born in the UK, and numbers are rising due partly to the increasing numbers of older mothers. Age increases the risk: last year, more women between 30 and 34 gave birth than any other age group.

If a pregnancy is found to be at risk during the first NHS scan, women are then offered chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocente­sis to confirm a diagnosis.

But those tests involve passing a needle into the womb to take a sample from the placenta or amniotic fluid, and can lead to miscarriag­e in as many as one in 100 women, many of them carrying healthy babies.

The new screening, which looks for fragments of foetal DNA in the mother’s blood, provides a way of finding out about even slight chromosoma­l changes, along with more establishe­d disabiliti­es such as Down’s syndrome, which affect one in 1,000 babies – without endangerin­g the unborn child.

BECAUSE of its unparallel­ed accuracy, the test could reveal ultra-rare disorders – so-called SWAN conditions, which stands for Syndrome Without A Name – that affect up to 6,000 births each year and might typically be missed until far later in pregnancy.

However, disability rights campaigner­s and many in the medical community have voiced concern that the test will lead to a rise in abortions, and even terminatio­ns of healthy foetuses if parents are given the wrong informatio­n about the actual effects of a chromosoma­l abnormalit­y.

Recent figures published by the Department of Health show that the number of abortions carried out because babies were found to have Down’s or other serious disabiliti­es has increased. Studies in the late 1990s found that when Down’s is diagnosed in a foetus, between 80 and 90 per cent of parents choose to undergo a terminatio­n.

The new test is the latest evolution of non-invasive pre-natal tests (NIPTs), which have so far not been considered diagnostic, and only clarify the extent of the risk that the child will be born with a chromosoma­l problem. Previous versions also generally analysed only selected chromosome pairs linked to major abnormalit­ies.

The MaterniT GENOME, made by California­n biotech company Sequenom, is the first to analyse all 46 chromosome pairs.

It means it can pick up unexpected changes to chromosome­s known as microdelet­ions, duplicatio­ns, translocat­ions and other tiny alteration­s that can lead to birth defects.

The company also says it can analyse chromosome­s at a more detailed level which is close to the resolution used to examine CVS and amniocente­sis results.

This makes the test more accurate, according to Sequenom, and only one in 200 parents will be given a diagnosis in error.

Jane Fisher, director of the charity Antenatal Results and Choices, urged caution, saying: ‘It’s a minefield. We’re very much on the side of parents gathering informatio­n should they want it. But there have to be massive caveats – you must have genetic expertise on hand to

help them understand informatio­n as it might flag up genetic variations of unknown significan­ce.

‘We’ve already had instances arising from private NIPT provision here where women are being given wrong informatio­n about the results from similar genetic tests, so it’s already a problem.

‘But such tests are often provided by private ultrasound clinics and they have absolutely no expertise in delivering complex genetic informatio­n. That’s hard enough for clinical geneticist­s to do. So it’s concerning that this will be available privately.’

The test will be available initially at The Medical Chambers in Kensington, West London. It involves taking a sample of blood from the arm, which is sent to Sequenom’s laboratori­es in America. The results are available on a secure server within a week.

OBSTETRIC ultrasound specialist Dr David Nyberg, from The Medical Chambers, said: ‘The new test will pick up about 15 per cent more chromosoma­l issues than other available tests. There’s always a danger we pick up something that doesn’t mean anything, so in those circumstan­ces we would check to see whether parents also have the genetic aberration or if it’s new in the baby, and recommend genetic counsellin­g.

‘The bottom line is that, for the first time, we’ll be offering a test which analyses all 46 chromosome­s at a resolution that is similar to that of standard karyotypin­g [chromosome analysis] from amniocente­sis.

‘This is one of the biggest breakthrou­ghs in foetal DNA testing ever. It has an unparallel­ed sensitivit­y of 99.9 per cent for multiple chromosome­s and a false positive rate as low as 0.05 per cent. What this means is that the test will show a positive result for an abnormalit­y where there isn’t one in less than one in 2,000 mums. These rates are significan­tly better than anything previously used.’

Professor Dennis Lo, professor of chemical pathology at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, pioneered NIPTs after discoverin­g the presence of foetal DNA in maternal blood. He said it would remain necessary to have a CVS or amniocente­sis to confirm the results from the new test.

‘The DNA we detect in the blood plasma from the baby is released by the placenta,’ Prof Lo said.

‘But the placenta could have a different chromosoma­l problem to the baby. And the more areas of the genome you target, the higher the chance there is of a false-positive happening.’

The National Screening Committee is set to examine trial data to determine whether NIPTs could be available as standard across the NHS. The trial found they could save the NHS money because fewer invasive tests would be needed, and the lives of about 300 unaffected babies, who are miscarried following amniocente­sis or CVS, could be saved.

William Welch, Sequenom’s president and CEO, said: ‘As pioneers and innovators in non-invasive prenatal testing, we believe it represents a safe, cost-effective and meaningful breakthrou­gh in NIPT, supporting physicians in providing superior prenatal care for their patients.’

 ??  ?? GIGGLER: Alison with Hazel, four. She was not expected to live past 16 weeks
GIGGLER: Alison with Hazel, four. She was not expected to live past 16 weeks
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom