The Scottish Mail on Sunday

Patients crippled by artificial metal hips to sue health giants for millions

- By Stephen Adams HEALTH CORRESPOND­ENT

HUNDREDS of Britons who received ‘metal-on-metal’ hip replacemen­ts are demanding millions of pounds in compensati­on from the manufactur­ers.

In a huge legal action, lawyers for about 700 people fitted with certain implants from three makers are taking a group case to the High Court.

The hips – which became popular in the 1990s – were meant to be stronger than those made of other materials.

Replacemen­ts are supposed to offer easy mobility for ten to 15 years. But studies suggest some metal models fail far sooner than they should – leaving patients in crippling pain.

Lawyers also claim the artificial hips have caused non-cancerous tumours, allergic reactions, and led to loss of muscle mass and bone strength.

Gene Matthews, partner at Leigh Day solicitors, said: ‘Some [patients] face needing several operations and in the worst cases might end up in a wheelchair.’ Such individual­s ‘might be looking at compensati­on worth hundreds of thousands’, he said, adding: ‘Across the group action, we are looking at tens of millions of pounds.’ Retired airline engineer Bernard James, who had metal-on-metal hip implants in 2006, said they had ‘ruined’ his life.

Two years after his operation, a pocket of fluid developed, and doctors recommende­d they were replaced. But the 76-yearold from Cardiff – who was a keen dog-walker – says he can now manage only half a mile.

In total, about 40,000 Britons have been given metal-on-metal hip components. The group action includes around 85 people with Durom implants by Zimmer; 400 with Pinnacle parts by Johnson & Johnson subsidiary DePuy; and 200 with Cormet parts, made by Corin.

Mr Justice Hickinbott­om at the High Court will next month rule on how the case should proceed.

A civil trial is expected in autumn next year.

Papers lodged by Corin’s solicitors at the court state: ‘Corin’s defence is that its products were safe.’ Zimmer said the claims were ‘vague’.

DePuy’s defence says that the ‘vast majority’ of patients with Pinnacle implants ‘have improved function without complicati­on’.

 ??  ?? WARNING: From law firm in US
WARNING: From law firm in US

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom