The Scottish Mail on Sunday

YOU’RE KIDDING!

A £212 saving on three almost identical outfits – just from buying teenage ranges?

- by Nancy Newman

WHEN Strictly Come Dancing host Tess Daly took to Twitter to say she had bagged a bargain gym outfit from the children’s rails, it came as no surprise to me. I have been doing the same thing for years. In fact, growing numbers of women are sneaking into the teenage department­s of high street stores to buy their outfits. This is no doomed attempt to roll back the years, however: the savings on offer are huge – 20 per cent and more, since children’s clothes do not attract VAT. Even Tess, at 5ft 8in, could find some things to suit so, at 5ft 3in, I fit perfectly into high street children’s fashions. Better news still: over the past year there has been little difference in style from adult ranges. Next, H&M and Zara are all selling fashionabl­e garments for teenagers. A Next outfit for a 16-year-old girl is the equivalent of an adult size 10 to 12 in the same store. And children’s shoes can reach up to a UK size 7 while selling for half the price of identical pairs for adults. The VAT discount is not the only saving. Buying children’s clothes means you avoid the huge mark-up stores impose on the latest trends in the adult section. I took three different looks and put the tactic to the test, but would my choices prove to be a fashion hit – or a bargain-basement blunder?

JEANS AND STRIPES:

Most people find it difficult to buy jeans, yet I loved the ones from Next’s children’s section. They fitted comfortabl­y without being too tight. Most adult versions include irritating rips, but these are classic. The children’s long-sleeve T-shirt had a luxurious, silky feel too, and was definitely a more flattering fit.

I received compliment­s on the children’s copper trainers. The ‘high-shine’ was more vibrant on the child version, and the thicker sole made them much more comfortabl­e than the pricier pair.

These outfits were almost identical – but the £117 price difference makes it impossible not to prefer the children’s option.

FROCK:

The adult knitted Asos dress was too baggy and the length was very unflatteri­ng. The adult boots were also too bulky and the high-shine made the genuine leather look cheap and fake. Ironically, the children’s pair felt more sophistica­ted.

The children’s dress was, admittedly, a little short but you could wear it as a top, and at just £11 it would still be a bargain.

DUNGAREES:

I had to roll up both sets of dungarees. However, the children’s version were much more comfortabl­e than the adult set, which was already a size bigger than my usual and a bit too snug.

When it came to the pumps, the women’s ballet-style pair had an annoying ribbon tie-up, while the girls’ were elasticate­d and much easier to wear. The other advantage? The child’s outfit was a whopping £63 cheaper.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom