The Scottish Mail on Sunday

I can’t close my late mum’s Skype account

- by Tony Hetheringt­on

Ms S.C. writes: Microsoft has proved unwilling to close the Skype account of my late mother since it appeared to be hacked last November. I have sent it her death certificat­e and the Grant of Probate, but I have made no progress. It would appear the only way it would consider closing the Skype account is if I obtain a court subpoena. But I am not asking it for any informatio­n, just the closure of the account. It appears uninterest­ed in the fact it has been hacked. YOUR mother died in 2012, but suddenly last November her Skype account burst into life again when someone you know received a message from it. The message recommende­d a dating website, with the claim: ‘It’s better than Tinder!’

You contacted Microsoft, which runs Skype, and you were asked for your mother’s death certificat­e, which you supplied. Shockingly, Microsoft replied: ‘We are unable to assist with the accounts of people who have passed away.’

You replied that as the executor of your mother’s estate, you wanted a supervisor to reconsider the matter. But the supervisor told you: ‘We cannot delete or make changes to an account without the account owner’s permission, regardless of the situation.’

She added: ‘For Microsoft to make any changes, a subpoena needs to be provided.’ She gave you 24 hours to reply or the company would regard the matter as closed.

I have the strong feeling Microsoft only paid heed to US laws. When you contacted the company’s UK office in Reading, you were told it had never received such a request from an executor. You kept being told staff could not give you any informatio­n about your mother’s Skype account – even when you repeatedly told it you did not want informatio­n, just for the account to be closed so the hacker could not use it.

I asked Microsoft exactly what families should do in these circumstan­ces – or was it happy to let the names of deceased Skype users bounce around cyberspace apparently sending inappropri­ate messages and upsetting their relatives. Microsoft told me it would immediatel­y suspend the account and that ‘the team are working with the customer’ – overlookin­g the fact that your mother died six years ago.

Finally, Microsoft admitted it had mishandled your closure request. It said: ‘The account in question has now been blocked and can no longer be used.’ Microsoft said it would review what had gone wrong and implement any necessary improvemen­ts to avoid a repetition.

The internet giant then came back and said its review had given it the chance to re-examine and clarify procedures. It concluded: ‘If a family would like to close the account of a deceased relative, they should contact us at support@microsoft. com, where they will need to first validate ownership of the account.’

My confidence was only slightly dented by the fact that a day later Microsoft told you the company is ‘now working to adjust our processes to provide assistance to individual­s with needs such as yours’. So has Microsoft really concluded its review and got its act together?

You might think that with all the adverse publicity surroundin­g the big beasts of the internet jungle and their inability to stop leaks, hacking and other offences, Microsoft would have had in place years ago a simple procedure for closing a deceased customer’s account. But it seems not.

Whether it has one now is anyone’s guess.

 ??  ?? HACKED: Microsoft wanted a subpoena to shut the dead woman’s account
HACKED: Microsoft wanted a subpoena to shut the dead woman’s account
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom