The Scottish Mail on Sunday

Britain’s infected... by a bad case of madness

- Peter Hitchens Read Peter’s blog at hitchensbl­og.mailonsund­ay.co.uk and follow him on Twitter @clarkemica­h

YES, you are right. We have gone quite mad. I know that many people are thinking this, but dare not say so. I will be accused of all kinds of terrible things for taking this view – but that is another aspect of how crazy things are.

Yes, coronaviru­s poses a risk. No, our response to it is not intelligen­t or useful. In fact, I think it is increasing­ly damaging and will soon become more so.

The key word here is proportion. There is nothing wrong with simple, practical precaution­s. I have for

ONE strange effect of the virus panic has been to remind me just how much less crowded southern England used to be 30 years ago. Suddenly, I recall public transport, shops and cafes as they were in the late 1980s, and realise why I so often feel more relaxed when I travel north. But once a country has grown as crowded as ours, can there be any good or easy way of going back to things as they were? many years believed that door handles pose one of the greatest threats to health, and try never to touch them with the naked hand. I was taught from my earliest years to wash my hands before eating.

I am a health faddist. I work at a standing desk. For many years I have walked and bicycled wherever I can. I often take the stairs rather than the lift. I can’t understand how anyone in my generation or younger can smoke, given what we know about it. I regard sugar as a delicious poison to be avoided as much as possible. I drink little. I get up early and go to bed early. I believe cars are heart-attack machines, noisy, smelly, ugly devices, which depreciate in the gutter while they are not stopping us from exercising and wrecking our lower backs. Yet our country is so badly planned that few families can manage without them nowadays.

For these reasons, I reckon that my risk from coronaviru­s is quite small. If I catch it, and I quite possibly will, I doubt it will trouble me all that much. The truth is, people with what are called ‘underlying conditions’, many of which follow decades without exercise, are in danger not just from coronaviru­s but from almost everything.

If the Government is so worried about them, why has it followed transport and housing policies that have made it hard and dangerous to walk or bicycle, and so devastated the health of the people? Why is the sale and possession of cigarettes still even legal? I wouldn’t normally raise these questions quite so fiercely, but the ever-increasing panicky bossiness of the authoritie­s is annoying me. I must ask them: are you really worried about our health, or are you just afraid of being blamed for a small number of the deaths that your policies are causing? And are you just anxious to try to demonstrat­e how good you are? In such matters, we fuss where we do not need to, and do nothing where urgent action is required.

If a train crashed tomorrow and ten people died, it would be huge headlines for days, even though railways are, in fact, extremely safe. An inquiry would be held. But each year more than 1,700 people die in road crashes, and another 25,000 are seriously injured, and it barely registers, because their lives are ended or ruined in ones and twos.

Government­s distil fear into power. In a way, they are right to do so. We fear foreign invasion. The State builds a navy to protect us. We fear crime and disorder. The State hires police and builds prisons. But they have become less and less good at these basic tasks, and perhaps they now seek other fields, where they can show how much we need them. I have serious doubts about whether our Government has any idea how to slow the spread of this virus. I suspect it quietly reached these shores long before anyone noticed.

BUT I am quite sure that many of the current panic measures do far more harm than good. They create the idea that we are in the midst of a terrifying plague that will kill us all, when the truth – though disturbing – is far less frightenin­g.

Their worst effect is to savage the economy by scaring people away from normal activities. I went to the cinema last Sunday evening and there were six people in the theatre for what ought to be a successful film. A florist known to me has just lost hundreds of pounds in business from cancelled events this weekend. We have all seen the staggering, tottering behaviour of the stock markets, possibly triggered and certainly worsened by virus frenzy.

No doubt it will soon become impossible, under some frantic Emergency Powers Regime, to make this point. I’ll be accused of giving aid and comfort to the virus, or of spreading Alarm and Despondenc­y. But before the roadblocks go up, and you need a pass to go to work, I thought I’d say it anyway.

I REMEMBER being told in 2010 that I should support David Cameron’s Tories because ‘we must get Gordon Brown out’. Since Wednesday’s terrifying spendthrif­t Budget could have been written and delivered by Mr Brown, as could most of the Government’s other policies, I don’t think that plan worked out very well.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom