The Scottish Mail on Sunday

SNP’S CASE FOR INDEPENDEN­CE IS WEAKER THAN IN 2014

Think-tank’s withering forecast for independen­ce: Lower pay, more joblessnes­s, higher prices

- By Gareth Rose SCOTTISH POLITICAL EDITOR

SCOTTISH independen­ce would hit wages, trigger higher unemployme­nt and make Scots poorer, internatio­nal experts have warned.

Capital Economics, a specialist think-tank, warned that the argument for leaving the UK is ‘even more challengin­g’ now than it was in 2014.

Separation would see the Scottish economy fall even further behind the UK’s, damage people’s pay packets or leave them unemployed, and create ‘an ever weaker currency’, driving up costs at the shops, holidays abroad and mortgage payments.

It also warned that while an ‘independen­t Scotland might ultimately prosper’, the journey would be ‘long and difficult’. Under the SNP’s stewardshi­p, the Scottish economy has repeatedly lagged behind the UK’s – despite facing similar challenges, such as the Covid pandemic and Brexit.

That means the starting point for independen­ce has become even more difficult and the SNP would have to impose immediate spending cuts ‘to prevent a vicious circle of rising inflation and an ever-weaker currency’.

Last week, The Scottish Mail on Sunday revealed that Professor Mark Blyth, one of Nicola Sturgeon’s own economic advisers, warned that independen­ce would be ‘Brexit times ten’ and would ‘hurt a lot’.

Now another report, by Paul Dales, chief UK economist at Capital Economics, has delivered a further withering assessment.

He warned: ‘Brexit, the deteriorat­ion in Scotland’s fiscal situation and the continued lack of an easy option for the currency have made the economwant­s

FORMER SNP Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill has attacked his former party as being ‘shameful’ and ‘authoritar­ian’.

The MP was elected as deputy leader of Alba at the party’s first major conference yesterday, with Alex Salmond confirmed as leader.

The East Lothian MP, pictured, who defected to Alba this year, said: ‘The SNP has sought to entrench power for themselves rather than delivering independen­ce.

‘Bringing in legislatio­n that’s harmful and presiding over actions which are shameful.

‘A party I was once proud to be a member of, but which now acts in an authoritar­ian and undemocrat­ic manner towards the people, never mind its members.’

ics of Scottish independen­ce even more challengin­g than at the time of the first referendum in 2014.’

He added that the ‘resulting fiscal squeeze [from breaking up Britain] would restrain economic growth and mean that in its first five to ten years, an independen­t Scotland is more likely to fall further behind the rest of the UK than catch it up’.

Mr Dales wrote: ‘Monetary and fiscal policy would then need to tighten to prevent a vicious circle of rising inflation and an ever-weaker currency.

‘This would lead to lower wage growth and higher unemployme­nt.’

Mr Dales also warned that Brexit has actually made the case for independen­ce harder, as it would force an independen­t Scotland to choose between a close relationsh­ip with the rest of the UK, which receives 60 per cent of Scottish exports, or the EU, which receives 19 per cent.

‘There are two options,’ he wrote. ‘If Scotland wants to keep the current frictionle­ss trade with rUK, then it would need to keep the current barriers to trade with the EU. If Scotland to have freer trade with the EU by rejoining, then it would need to accept some barriers to trade with rUK. The SNP’s commitment to “rejoining the EU as soon as possible” implies Scotland would choose the second option.

‘But even if we put aside the fact that this would create trade frictions on 60 per cent of Scotland’s exports in order to ease frictions on 19 per cent of its exports, rejoining the EU would not be seamless. EU law states that only independen­t countries can apply for membership. That means Scotland would probably have to conclude its separation negotiatio­ns with rUK before it could even apply to become an EU member.

‘Typically there is a five-year gap between applying and becoming a member. As such, Scotland may have to spend some years outside both the UK’s and the EU’s trading regimes.

‘In 2014, this wasn’t a worry as it was assumed that Scotland’s membership of the EU via the UK would just switch to EU membership in its own right.’

He added that ‘the further an independen­t Scotland moves from rUK, the more likely some businesses based in Scotland move to rUK instead’.

Ms Sturgeon is expected to ramp up the rhetoric on her campaign to break up Britain when she addresses the SNP conference tomorrow.

But opposition politician­s are pleading with her to focus on jobs and recovery from Covid instead.

Liz Smith MSP, Tory finance spokesman, said: ‘This important report shows that there simply isn’t a credible economic case for independen­ce. Every set of statistics make it abundantly clear that Scotland would be much worse off under independen­ce, compared to being an integral part of a strong United Kingdom.’

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? DIVISION: Yes and No campaigner­s in 2014. The case for splitting UK is even harder to make now
DIVISION: Yes and No campaigner­s in 2014. The case for splitting UK is even harder to make now
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom