The Scottish Mail on Sunday

Why Diana is the third wheel in Harry and Meghan’s marriage

As a girl of 16, she wept when she saw his funeral f lowers to ‘Mummy’. He says he thinks of her every single day of his life. Now the Princess’s confidant ANDREW MORTON reveals...

-

acknowledg­ed humanitari­an. The only puzzle remained as to whether this ambitious, intelligen­t, modern and successful woman would stay the course.

Had the Princess of Wales been present at Harry and Meghan’s wedding reception at Frogmore House in the grounds of Windsor’s Home Park, she would have admired Meghan’s chutzpah and self-confidence in breaking protocol, taking the microphone and giving her own short speech.

Diana, in contrast, had been the one who stood at the back in school plays and pantos, terrified of being given a speaking part.

Although they grew up a generation and a world apart, much still connected these two women. Both were glamorous and charismati­c, both believed that they were invested with a power to do good in the world. At first, Meghan was seen as a bridge between the Monarchy’s past and its future. That sunny wedding day in May 2018 was a signpost to a glorious, more inclusive tomorrow. Yet, for many reasons, the young American was absorbed into neither the Royal Family nor the country.

And from the earliest months, her complaints of loneliness, isolation and a lack of support had an all-too-familiar ring.

Meghan, a girl in a hurry, took quite some time to get to grips with Palace politics, the immutable hierarchy and the endless deference.

She came to realise, as Diana had done, that everything was not as it seemed in this looking-glass world. A generation later, Meghan’s observatio­ns of life in the Royal goldfish bowl were an uncanny echo of her late mother-in-law.

Remember Diana’s first impression­s of the Palace: ‘I couldn’t believe how cold everyone was; how I thought one thing but actually another thing was going on. The lies and the deceit.’

For her part, Meghan felt she was judged on the basis of mediagener­ated impression­s rather than on her actual life.

As she told Oprah Winfrey in that explosive interview: ‘It’s easy to have an image that is so far from reality. There’s a complete misalignme­nt and there’s no way to explain that to people.’

The media account of her life began to mirror the stories associated with Princess Diana.

Around the same time that she was accused of making Kate cry in a row over bridesmaid­s, for example, Meghan found herself blamed for the premature departure of Royal staff.

These included her personal assistant Melissa Touabti, whom she is said to have reduced to tears, temporary private secretary Samantha Cohen and her Scotland Yard bodyguard.

DIANA, too, had been blamed for a series of departures, from Prince Charles’s valet, bodyguard and private secretary to friends and members of his social circle.

In a matter of months, Diana had gone from being a fairytale princess to – according to less charitable accounts – a ‘fiend’ and a ‘little monster’. Other commentato­rs talked about ‘Malice in the Palace’. At one engagement, the exasperate­d Princess told veteran Royal watcher James Whitaker: ‘I am not responsibl­e for any sackings. I don’t just sack people.’

Meghan too found her public reputation collapsing almost overnight. From a certain point, whatever she did, Meghan was a divisive figure.

Yet there had been no doubting the Sussexes’ popularity. When they launched their official Instagram site, @sussexroya­l, they attracted a million followers in less than six hours.

By January 2020, 11.3 million fans had joined their site.

This popularity soon started to concern some courtiers, who once again saw shades of Diana, the charismati­c newcomer potentiall­y overshadow­ing the rest of the Royal Family, particular­ly the two immediate heirs to the throne, Charles and William. ‘The danger to them is that Meghan is going to be bigger than Diana,’ a source told one journalist.

Harry later told Oprah Winfrey that the couple’s tour of Australia, Fiji, Tonga and New Zealand in October 2018 was ‘the first time that the family got to see how incredible she is at the job. And that brought back memories’.

He was referring to his parents’ famous 1983 tour of Australia and New Zealand, during which Prince Charles became jealous of Diana’s popularity.

In public, the Prince of Wales made light of the fact that during walkabouts, the crowds would groan when he went to their side of the road; in private, he criticised his wife.

When we were working on her biography, the Princess had told me: ‘The public side was very different from the private side.

‘The public side, they wanted a fairy princess to come and touch them and everything will turn into gold and all their worries would be forgotten. Little did they realise that the individual was crucifying herself inside because she didn’t think she was good enough. “Why me, why all this publicity?” My husband started to get very jealous and anxious by then, too.’

That same jealousy, in Meghan and Harry’s view, was now directed at them. They were too current, too fresh, too challengin­g for what they saw as the old guard.

Harry had always been prickly at any suggestion of criticism of his wife, and from now on he seemed even more sensitive and quick to take offence.

At about this time, Meghan’s suicidal thoughts during her first pregnancy found a dark echo in the past. Even though she was happily married to Harry, Meghan felt a profound sense of isolation and loneliness during her first pregnancy, a feeling that she was somehow trapped in an unfriendly, unfamiliar and unforgivin­g new world.

WHEN Diana went to live at Buckingham Palace, shortly after her own engagement, she had come to feel like a captive in a Grimms’ fairy tale. As the walls of the prison house closed inexorably around her, the public knew nothing about her ordeal, choosing, instead, to celebrate Prince Charles’s good fortune.

And when she was struggling with the eating disorder bulimia nervosa and post-natal depression following the birth of Prince William, thoughts of taking her own life had scudded across Diana’s mind. ‘I just wanted to keep my head above water,’ she once told me. As the controvers­y around the

Every camera click and whirr reminds Harry of his mother’s terrible fate

latest Royal couple mounted, characters from Diana’s lifetime sometimes rode to Meghan’s defence. When Harry drew criticism for their use of private jets, for example, Sir Elton John, one of their hosts, mounted a defence of the Duke and Duchess and invoked the spirit of Harry’s mother.

‘Diana, Princess of Wales was one of my dearest friends,’ he said. ‘I feel a profound sense of obligation to protect Harry and his family from the unnecessar­y press intrusion that contribute­d to Diana’s untimely death.’

Not every parallel was negative. When Harry visited Botswana and Angola in September 2019, he made global headlines when he retraced his mother’s steps in Huambo.

Back in 1997, Diana had walked through a cleared Angolan minefield. Now that same minefield was a bustling shopping and community centre.

During the visit, Harry donned the same body armour as his mother when he walked through a similarly marked-out minefield nearby, the Prince remotely exploding a mine during the event. The pictures reminded the world of Diana’s legacy and gave Harry a global platform to talk about the progress that had been made.

‘It has been quite emotional retracing my mother’s steps,’ he said, subsequent­ly adding: ‘I lost her 22 years ago, but the memory of her is with me daily and her legacy lives on.’

Diana remains a constant inspiratio­n to the couple, in the subtlest ways. In a Valentine’s Day Instagram post this year, shortly after stepping down as working members of the Royal Family, they revealed that they were expecting their second child.

In years gone by, Diana, too, had welcomed Oprah Winfrey into her Kensington Palace apartment. When Harry and Meghan eventually sat down for their own TV interview with the US superstar TV personalit­y, they made the criticism of the Royal Family by Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer, at her funeral in Westminste­r Abbey seem mild by comparison. The rest is history.

There were hopes, in this modern Cain and Abel drama, that William and Harry would be publicly reconciled at the unveiling of a statue of their mother on what would have been her 60th birthday on July 1. However, while the brothers seemed at ease and chatted amiably with the small group of attendees, mainly members of the Spencer family, there was no public overture of friendship.

Meanwhile, Meghan, once again a new mother, stayed in California.

The comparison­s with Diana were inevitable, of course. Both were and are controvers­ial women who were agents of change in their own contrastin­g ways.

And it is clear the comparison­s will continue to be made for some time to come.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? MISSION: Meghan and Diana aimed to change the world
MISSION: Meghan and Diana aimed to change the world

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom