The Scottish Mail on Sunday

First, Biden betrayed the Afghans to the Taliban. Now, he’s thrown Ukraine to the wolves

- By NIALL FERGUSON AUTHOR AND HISTORIAN ● Niall Ferguson is a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institutio­n, Stanford, the managing director of Greenmantl­e, and a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.

FOLLOWING the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Western world entered a strange interlude in which we forgot about the realities of great power politics. In a way, 79-year-old President Joe Biden personifie­s that forgetfuln­ess. During the 1990s, the West turned a blind eye to genocide in Rwanda and only woke up to the Balkans War after a great deal of dithering. In Bosnia and Kosovo, belated US interventi­on bailed out Europe.

After 9/11, we became laser-focused on a threat from an ideology – political or radical Islam or Islamism – not from a great power. We ‘went to war against terror’. The US led and Europe mostly followed.

In the end, we succeeded, and failed. We succeeded in preventing another 9/11, killing Osama Bin Laden, and crushing Islamic State. We mostly failed to create a stable Iraq and utterly failed to create a stable Afghanista­n.

But the real failure was to ignore the resurgence of two of the old great powers, China and Russia. Not just to ignore, but to enable their rise.

Americans helped China’s rapid growth, especially after the Beijing government was allowed into the World Trade Organisati­on. Americans told themselves a fairy story that China would liberalise.

As for Russia, its return to military power was enabled by Europeans buying Russian natural gas and oil and turning a blind eye to Putin’s increasing­ly despotic rule. Europeans told themselves a fairy story that Russia would liberalise.

We had ample evidence that we were making a mistake.

First, the Russian interventi­on in the Syrian civil war, which followed Barack Obama’s absurd declaratio­n in 2013 that ‘America is not the world’s policeman’.

Then came the Russian annexation of Crimea and the first Ukrainian war in 2014, to which the West responded with feeble sanctions.

Joe Biden was Vice-President then. Has it slipped his mind how that played out?

There was a brief interrupti­on to this story of collective amnesia under President Donald Trump.

Europeans were disgusted. But did Russia invade anywhere between 2017 and 2020?

Unfortunat­ely, despite grand claims that the Biden administra­tion would be a transforma­tive presidency on a par with Roosevelt’s, this has swiftly turned into a rerun of Jimmy

Carter’s weak presidency, with added dementia.

DOMESTICAL­LY the administra­tion is in disarray with inflation higher than at any time since 1982, violent crime surging and the Southern border overwhelme­d with illegal immigrants.

But the picture abroad is worse. Last year, Biden abandoned the people of Afghanista­n to the Taliban. This year it is the turn of the people of Ukraine to be thrown to the wolves.

There was never the remotest chance that the threat of sanctions would deter Putin from invading.

It didn’t help when Biden seemed to suggest he wouldn’t necessaril­y penalise a ‘minor’ incursion.

The only thing that would have made Putin think twice was the presence in Ukraine of significan­t military hardware, but the Biden administra­tion slowed deliveries of arms to Kyiv.

Last year, it removed sanctions on companies building the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, designed by Russia and Germany to bypass Ukraine. What’s more, Biden discovered that China and Russia are hand in glove after he tried to get President Xi Jinping to dissuade Putin from invading Ukraine.

The naivety would beggar belief if Biden was not manifestly in his second childhood.

What happens next? First, despite spirited defence, Ukraine’s military seems likely to be overwhelme­d. There is heroic resistance but Russians will surely control the country’s capital within days.

Second, the EU and US seem likely to impose the sanctions that cost themselves the least, and therefore hurt Putin the least.

Instead, Europeans should be cutting energy imports from Russia and the US must hammer Russian banks and arm Ukraine to the teeth. But that can’t happen fast enough.

Inevitably, Putin will ask himself: Who’s next? For the reconstruc­tion of the Tsarist empire, which is his life’s work, will not stop with the subjugatio­n of Ukraine.

Nato will need to get serious, and fast, about bolstering the defences of the Baltic states and Poland.

Already, Putin is reminding the West of the old reality that only ‘tactical’ nuclear missiles could credibly check Russian convention­al forces in case of a full-scale war – and those in turn would invite Russian nuclear retaliatio­n and the possibilit­y of Armageddon.

Next we could see a desperate scramble by Biden to resuscitat­e a nuclear deal with Iran in the hope of readmittin­g Iranian oil to the world market and easing the pressure on petrol prices.

Finally, and most importantl­y, if Putin can triumph in Ukraine, it significan­tly raises the probabilit­y that China will seek a similar triumph by invading Taiwan.

Malaise often takes the form of a cascade of reverses, as Jimmy Carter learned in 1979, when the

Nato needs to get serious fast and bolster the defences against Putin

A Russian triumph could inspire China to invade Taiwan

Iranian revolution was followed by the Soviet invasion of Afghanista­n.

I fear we are at the early stage of just such a cascade today – and, as he watches it unfold, Joe Biden will helplessly wonder why it seems faintly familiar.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom