The Scottish Mail on Sunday

I quit as a journalist to become an MSP in a desperate attempt to get answers, but all I’ve encountere­d is secrecy and arrogance from Sturgeon’s SNP

- By RUSSELL FINDLAY CONSERVATI­VE MSP AND SPOKESMAN FOR COMMUNITY SAFETY

SHRILL SNP politician­s love to shriek and point fingers at the political system in Westminste­r with a production line of increasing­ly hysterical hyperbole. Talk about a lack of self-awareness. They must wander around the Scottish parliament with their eyes shut and ears closed.

Battling for answers was part of the grind during my near threedecad­e career as an investigat­ive journalist. Exposing the dirty world of organised crime was difficult and often dangerous, but it seems like a stroll in the park compared with my frustratio­ns of being an MSP.

Nicola Sturgeon and her wellpadded coterie of nationalis­t obsessives have devoted their lives to breaking up the UK. She presides over a vast and self-serving establishm­ent apparatus in Edinburgh which is best defined as smug, secretive and arrogant.

When freedom of informatio­n law was first enacted at the turn of the new millennium, I recall being promised that public bodies would willingly release info – no matter how uncomforta­ble it might be.

I’m embarrasse­d to admit that I actually fell for this spiel. As the years passed, the law became neutered by transparen­cy-hating officials who found increasing­ly smart alec ways of withholdin­g informatio­n from the public.

And it is that same culture that contaminat­es Sturgeon’s government and seeps through our devolved parliament which rarely feels like anything other than an expensive concrete talking shop.

Sturgeon’s testimony last week at the parliament­ary committee investigat­ing her government’s corrupt and obscene ferries fiasco is worth watching.

My Scottish Conservati­ve colleague Craig Hoy, who’s also a former journalist, did a magnificen­t job of quizzing the First Minister with concise, focused and well-researched questions.

But it felt like a rerun of her infamous performanc­e at the Alex Salmond scandal committee – both being masterclas­ses in selective amnesia and sleekit evasion.

Sturgeon likes to remind journalist­s about her supposedly high intellect with the over-arching tone being that she knows best, she is always right and the paying public really must learn their place and show their respect.

As a reporter, I became infuriated at the SNP establishm­ent’s highhanded war on transparen­cy, accountabi­lity and scrutiny. I thought that I could do more good in parliament than outside of it. Now, having spent 18 months in the political bubble, I’m not so sure.

Debate is strictly controlled. Opposing voices are stifled. Questions are rarely ever answered.

In recent weeks, I decided to express some of my frustratio­ns with a series of videos that I filmed outside the building. I had wanted to ask Ministers about serious issues including the sexual assault of a female police officer who blew the whistle on a boys’ club culture; the revelation of 500 sex offenders being allowed to change their names; and warnings about thousands of police jobs being axed due to SNP budget cuts.

Unfortunat­ely, my questions were not picked and remain unanswered. I understand that parliament­ary time is finite and that other MSPs also have important issues that truly matter to the people of Scotland. But even had my questions been selected, I ask whether it would have made any difference.

I’ll give a recent example in which I asked Justice Secretary Keith Brown about a Chamber of Commerce warning that youths are using free bus travel to assemble in Glasgow city centre to commit crimes and antisocial behaviour. While I didn’t expect any meaningful or insightful response, Brown instead made the following nonsensica­l assertion: ‘It would be nice, on occasion, to hear one or two good things said about the police by Conservati­ve members.’

Another option for MSPs is to lodge formal written questions. In my experience, the answers typically provided are as feeble and sparse as what is usually yielded by a freedom of informatio­n inquiry.

During the pantomime of First Minister’s Questions, Sturgeon causes me to squirm with her pathetic routine of deflecting from her government’s many failings by blaming the UK Government.

Her answers, mostly read from her giant ring-bound folder of scripts, go on interminab­ly yet rarely contain anything of substance. I pity school pupils in the public gallery for having to witness this tedium and I am reliably informed that even the parliament­ary authoritie­s seem to agree with my party that it does not work.

Supine SNP politician­s should take a long, hard look at themselves. Backbenche­rs at Westminste­r take pride in asking hard questions on behalf of constituen­ts, which is in stark contrast to Sturgeon’s seatfillin­g Holyrood automatons.

Many of them appear to serve the sole purpose of offering up softball questions to allow the First Minister to grandstand on matters often not devolved to Holyrood.

On one occasion a nationalis­t MSP read out a closing speech, crediting the previous speakers as is customary. The problem was that he was the first speaker. Thankfully, the presiding officer spared further blushes by telling him to sit down.

There was another recent episode where an SNP member asked Sturgeon a question. The First Minister began reading out an answer from her big folder. It took a while to realise that she was reading the wrong scripted answer to another planted pro-government question.

Holyrood was created with lofty goals of achieving ‘a better politics’. It’s failing to deliver. There’s nothing new about politician­s dodging scrutiny. That’s old hat. But our Scottish parliament is broken, and it needs fixing.

It is frustratin­g, farcical and

It rarely feels like anything other than an expensive talking shop

After 15 years in power, they continue to turn the screw on free debate

sometimes unintentio­nally amusing, but the consequenc­es are real and harmful. Secrecy and the shutting down of scrutiny hammers taxpayers and breeds a regime in which no one is held to account.

Take the costly scandals of the ferries, the Salmond complaint process, the Crown Office’s Rangers malicious prosecutio­ns – not a single person has been held responsibl­e for any of it.

An over-mighty government breeds arrogance in legislatio­n. Look at some of the laws that it has produced since 2014. The flawed Offensive Behaviour At Football Act. The hated Named Persons policy. The unworkable Hate Crime Act. And now, it’s railroadin­g through the deeply concerning Gender Recognitio­n Reform Bill.

Time after time, the SNP rushes to act without limitation, aided by its nationalis­t pals the Greens, and the people of Scotland suffer the consequenc­es.

Make no mistake – the fault here lies with SNP Ministers and especially Sturgeon herself. If they chose to be open and accountabl­e, the parliament and all of Scotland would benefit.

After 15 years in power, they continue to turn the screw on free debate while complainin­g about the need for more powers but refusing to use the ones they already have. This can’t go on. We will only be able to improve Scotland if we improve how parliament works and that means removing this rotten SNP cabal from power.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? DODGING SCRUTINY: First Minister Nicola Sturgeon is prone to selective amnesia and sleekit evasion
DODGING SCRUTINY: First Minister Nicola Sturgeon is prone to selective amnesia and sleekit evasion

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom