Eddie has created a culture of fear. He’s out of excuses
I’VE spoken to a lot of people in and around the England set-up and it feels like it is time for change. Eddie Jones has lost the support of the public and it’s hard to see how he can turn that around. As far as talent goes, there’s no reason why England shouldn’t be fighting with the likes of Ireland, France and South Africa. He is not getting the best out of his resources and he has run out of excuses.
Eddie is an experienced coach and, from my own experience, what he does on the grass is good. His tactical and technical knowledge is second to none, but that only gets you so far. Rugby players have changed a lot over the last decade and the environment coaches create is more important than ever.
Speaking from my own experiences and hearing from others, the England team is an environment of fear. Players are scared of making mistakes and I believe that reflects what is delivered on the pitch. Things like kicking the ball out when you’re drawing with 14-man All Blacks and have all the momentum, in what is effectively a friendly, is an example of that.
Eddie’s the leader of that environment. Why have there not been more questions asked about the massive turnover of staff? In any other business sphere that would be a red flag. You hear of guys signing NDAs (non-disclosure agreements) when they leave their posts. Why don’t they want them to talk?
Whenever a coach moves on, it is always presented as a success story for England’s production line. You don’t take on a job with England to use it as a leg up for something. It’s one of the top jobs in rugby.
Why do they keep wanting to leave? Why did former England hockey coach Danny Kerry want to leave a few days into his job as training coordinator this autumn? All of these stories add up. It’s glaringly obvious there’s a problem with staff churn and that starts with the leader.
No one has ever investigated that or held him to account and it sounds like the penny has finally dropped. We’re all bored of hearing Eddie come out and say: ‘It’s all my fault, I take full responsibility’, when they have a bad defeat because it’s an inconsequential soundbite. His go-to line. England had some great results during his early years but maybe he’s complicated things trying to prove his knowledge.
It’s all well and good asking the players for their views but I don’t think you will ever get full transparency because they’ve got to think of themselves. If Bill Sweeney rings Owen Farrell, Maro Itoje, Marcus Smith, will they throw Eddie (right) under the bus? They won’t want to risk their place in the team and who can blame them. It’s your dream on the line, the pride of playing for your country and the financial rewards of almost £20,000 a game.
I’ve seen first-hand that if you challenge Eddie — like Danny Care, Danny Cipriani, Alex Goode — then you get moved on very quickly.
I do not agree with this review panel being anonymous. What have they got to hide? I just don’t get it. And of the names we are hearing, guys like Ian McGeechan, Phil De Glanville, Jonathan Webb, they are legends but they’ve not been involved in high-performance environments in sport for years.
Why aren’t they looking to guys with their finger on the pulse, who have been involved in rugby as players or coaches recently, have an expert understanding of the ecosystem and landscape of the Premiership and not sat on an RFU board, like Richard Wigglesworth,
Ugo Monye or Nick Easter? Measured, independent guys who are passionate about English rugby and don’t go around throwing hand grenades like Austin Healey. If they haven’t already, I would get one or two people who run high-performance programmes in other sports to join the review. It’s not like the RFU don’t have the budget to pull together the best review team they could find. Eddie’s the highest-paid coach in world rugby. He’s probably got the biggest budget in world rugby and he’s been allowed to bring in guys like Neil Craig, psychologists, eye and gym specialists. If you throw all that together, then there needs to be change.
The RFU need to look outside the box. Steve Borthwick would be the classic RFU selection but he wouldn’t be my pick. Steve learnt his trade under Eddie, so he’s going to be similar. I’ve already backed Scott Robertson and I stand by that. Scott has worked with one of the most successful clubs in rugby, the Crusaders, and they have certain aspects that are most like a northern hemisphere team.
No, he hasn’t experienced the landscape of English rugby but we had a few conversations during the Barbarians camp and he has unbelievable awareness of himself and what people he would need to get to fill the gaps. He listens, understands the different personalities. In sport we’ve seen enough evidence that there’s an immediate reaction to bringing someone in. England have the talent to see a reaction. The right changes would completely change the mood for players, staff and fans, going into the World Cup.