The Sentinel

PARISH COUNCIL ROW SEES TAXPAYERS HIT WITH £20,000 BILL

Member faces formal censure as bullying and harassment complaints are upheld

- Phil Corrigan philip.corrigan@reachplc.com

AN INVESTIGAT­ION into a row at a parish council will cost taxpayers about £20,000.

Councillor Angela Drakakis-smith faces being ‘censured’ by Betley, Balterley and Wrinehill Parish Council after she was found to have breached its code of conduct.

The recommenda­tion from the standards hearings panel at Newcastle Borough Council comes after a lengthy solicitor’s investigat­ion into complaints against Cllr Drakakissm­ith, including claims she ‘bullied’ former parish clerk Gwyn Griffiths.

Now the borough has issued the parish council with a bill for £23,865, including about £4,000 VAT, to cover the cost of the investigat­ion.

The borough council, which deals with standards complaints at parish councils within its boundaries, commission­ed a specialist employment solicitor at Analysis Legal to look into the complaints. But the parish council is questionin­g whether it should have to pay the cost of the investigat­ion, which is more than its current reserves.

Mr Griffiths, three councillor­s and a member of the public made formal complaints against Cllr Drakakissm­ith in 2022 and 2023, saying she had breached the code through behaviour such as bombarding the clerk with emails and requests for informatio­n, and continuall­y questionin­g the accuracy of his minutes.

Cllr Drakakis-smith denied what she did amounted to bullying and claimed she herself had been subjected to a ‘hostile environmen­t’ after joining the parish council in 2022. But hearing panel members agreed in full with Analysis Legal’s findings, contained in an 80-page report, that she had breached the code by failing to show respect for others, bullying and harassing Mr Griffiths, and bringing the parish council into disrepute.

The panel also agreed Cllr Drakakissm­ith had been ‘inappropri­ately sarcastic and disrespect­ful’ to other parish councillor­s. While Cllr Drakakis-smith’s offer of an apology to Mr Griffiths was considered a mitigating factor, the fact she had not accepted that a ‘whole range’ of her behaviour had been in breach of the code was an aggravatin­g factor.

The panel has recommende­d the parish council formally censures Cllr Drakakis-smith, and removes her from any external appointmen­ts or positions of responsibi­lity. The panel also recommende­d that its decision be formally reported to the parish council at its next meeting and that letters to the council and to Cllr Drakakis-smith be made public.

During the standards hearing, Cllr Drakakis-smith raised concerns over the cost of the investigat­ion and said she had held back from making complaints herself, as she believed disputes could be ‘dealt with internally’. She said: “The monitoring officer suggested that making a complaint would be expensive and counterpro­ductive. I have refuted all the allegation­s made against me by the three councillor­s and those made against me by the Betley resident.

“It is the complainan­ts and the chair who insisted on taking the matters further. It is costing residents in Betley parish £23,000 and counting.”

The complaints were referred to the borough’s monitoring officer, who commission­ed Analysis Legal’s investigat­ion. This involved interviews with all the complainan­ts, the parish council chairman and Cllr Drakakissm­ith, along with examinatio­n of documentar­y evidence including emails and minutes.

As the parish council is a separate organisati­on, the hearings panel can only make recommenda­tions rather than impose sanctions directly on Cllr Drakakis-smith. The parish council is due to discuss the recommenda­tions from the hearings panel at an extraordin­ary meeting on May 17.

According to the minutes of the last parish council meeting last month, councillor­s expressed concerns over the invoice from the borough, as they had ‘certainly not authorised the expenditur­e’. Parish council chair Robert Bettley-smith said he was discussing the matter with the borough council.

A spokesman for Newcastle Borough Council said: “The cost to taxpayers of dealing with the investigat­ion would be in the region of £20,000, which reflects the time taken for Analysis Legal to consider the extensive submission­s made by those involved and to write the report.

“This figure does not include the time of staff at Newcastle Borough Council.”

 ?? Picture: Mark Degg ?? BLAZE: Neighbours in Lightwood saw smoke from a warehouse fire – 26 miles away in Cannock.
Ten fire engines were sent to the huge blaze, in Cley Road, which sent plumes of smoke billowing into the sky. It is understood the fire started at the Super Smart Service warehouse just before 6.15am yesterday.
Picture: Mark Degg BLAZE: Neighbours in Lightwood saw smoke from a warehouse fire – 26 miles away in Cannock. Ten fire engines were sent to the huge blaze, in Cley Road, which sent plumes of smoke billowing into the sky. It is understood the fire started at the Super Smart Service warehouse just before 6.15am yesterday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom