The Sunday Post (Inverness)

The new abnormal

How better scientific knowledge on Covid transmissi­on is shifting government­s’ response across the world

- By Peter Swindon pswindon@sundaypost.com

Scientific understand­ing of how Covid spreads – and the prevention measures promoted by government­s – has changed markedly since the World Health Organisati­on declared a pandemic on March 11 last year.

From the risk of asymptomat­ic transmissi­on to ventilatio­n in enclosed spaces, advice has evolved as new studies are published.

And more recently advice on which groups should, and should not, be vaccinated has changed markedly.

This month the first major randomised control trial of the effectiven­ess of face coverings was published and it found surgical masks reduce symptomati­c infections.

The results of a study of 342,126 adults in 600 villages in rural Bangladesh showed symptomati­c infections fell 11.2% overall and 34.7% among individual­s aged 60-plus when face coverings were used. The study also found physical distancing increased.

However, the World Health Organisati­on (WHO) did not recommend mask adoption until June 2020, citing lack of evidence from community-based randomised controlled trials, as well as concerns maskwearin­g would create a false sense of security and discourage physical distancing. A worldwide shortage of PPE is also thought to have contribute­d to the WHO decision not to encourage the public to purchase surgical masks.

In Scotland face coverings on public transport became mandatory on June 22, 2020, and the following month the law was extended to cover shops. However, the First Minister insisted at the time face coverings were not a substitute for other measures such as physical distancing and hand washing.

These measures were key planks of the Scottish Government’s FACTS campaign (face covering, avoid crowds, clean hands, two-metre distance, selfisolat­e). And Nicola Sturgeon’s mantra at her regular Covid briefings was “remember FACTS”, and the public health message was promoted by a £1.5 million marketing campaign.

However, studies now show ventilatin­g enclosed spaces – which was not covered in FACTS – is far more effective than scrubbing hard surfaces and sanitising hands.

Virologist Dr Jeremy Rossman said: “Our understand­ing has changed dramatical­ly over the past year and a half. With this has come some changes in the recommende­d mitigation measures.

“For example, early on in the pandemic surface-disinfecti­on and

hand-washing were widely encouraged as good ways to minimise the spread of e virus, in addition to other methsuch ods as distancing. “These measures are still eneficial, though the research as shown contact transmisio­n does not seem to play a big role in spreading the virus, and o sanitising surfaces and hands as less of a positive benefit on Covid-19 than previously thought – though it is still helpful and also reduces the risks of getting other infectious diseases.

“However, it’s not so much a matter of recommenda­tions proving to be wrong but, instead, a growing realisatio­n that additional measures are necessary. The main reason for the need for these additional measures was the awareness that Covid-19 spreads through the air in aerosols. Because of this, airborne precaution­s have emerged as some of the primary and most impactful mitigation recommenda­tions. “We now know face masks, avoiding crowded indoor spaces and improving indoor airflow and ventilatio­n makes very large difference­s in transmissi­on. Hand-washing and distancing are still helpful, but these newer measures play a critical role in reducing transmissi­on.” Public health expert Professor Linda Bauld said: “In terms of mitigation­s, ventilatio­n became more important and sanitising surfaces less so. Airborne transmissi­on was underplaye­d for months. We also hugely underestim­ated the extent of asymptomat­ic transmissi­on early in the pandemic.” The European Centre fo Disease Prevention and Control warned of the dangers of asymptomat­ic transmissi­on on

March 12, 2020, but the Scottish Government continued to move hundreds of untested and apparently well hospital patients to care homes. Dozens of infectious patients who had tested positive were also transferre­d in the weeks before and after the first lockdown.

More than 3,300 care home residents have died in Scotland – a third of all Covid deaths. Sturgeon and her former health secretary, Jeane Freeman, since admitted mistakes were made. A longawaite­d public inquiry is expected to be launched by the end of this year. Meanwhile, the Scottish Government’s FACTS campaign has disappeare­d. It was scrapped in July when the majority of legal restrictio­ns aimed at cutting transmissi­on were dropped. Sturgeon is now pushing ventilatio­n as a key mitigation measure but some of the outdated advice remains.

At a Covid briefing on August 27 she urged the public to minimise physical contact, such as handshakin­g, wash hands and scrub surfaces regularly.

Professor Andrew Watterson, an expert in public health at Stirling University, said: “The Scottish Government’s changes in Covid controls and removal of most necessary mitigation measures have led to a predictabl­e and great surge in cases.

“Undoubtedl­y, the Scottish Government’s new Covid advice is less bad than that of England’s in terms of some mask advice and working at home if possible. However, the dropping of Facts-based restrictio­ns in favour of vague guidance, the emphasis on hospital numbers as the key to triggering relaxation of restrictio­ns, and the failure to ensure more younger people and children were vaccinated has led to a disastrous rise in Covid cases and, with it, will come a large surge in Long Covid cases. There have been missed opportunit­ies to offer better advice in line with best internatio­nal evidence on Covid mitigation­s.”

Sturgeon always insisted her decisions were based on the best advice available at any given time and hailed the rollout of vaccines as a reason for the relaxation of restrictio­ns. Speaking in early August, Sturgeon said: “It has already saved many lives, and achieved a huge amount of success.”

Since then, more groups have been included in the rollout, including offering jags to all children over the age of 12 from tomorrow.

The UK’S vaccine advisory body fused to green-light the move on medical grounds alone but Scotland’s chief medioffice­r cal said the rollout could be extended to all teenagers because it would reduce disruption to education and benefit those in the poorest areas.

Scotland is also to join the other UK nations in offering a booster shot of the Pfizer vaccine to all adults over 50, frontline health and care workers, younger adults with health conditions that put them at higher risk, and adult household contacts of people with suppressed immune systems.

The decision to begin a booster programme is based on new studies that suggest immunity offered by vaccines can wane after six months.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom