The Sunday Post (Inverness)

Home-owners caught in cladding crisis claim Scots ministers have done nothing

Trapped in limbo for five years since Grenfell disaster, Scots urge official action

- By Russell Blackstock rblackstoc­k@sundaypost.com

A pilot scheme to assess the extent of the cladding

crisis in Scotland has yet to complete a single survey, six months after it was launched.

Almost five years after the Grenfell fire tragedy, flat owners and tenants in Scotland remain in limbo, with many still unclear if they have dangerous cladding, those with it unable to move, and no clarity over whether and when compensati­on will be available.

In August the Scottish Government announced a pilot scheme to assess the number of affected buildings, with free tests to be carried out on 25 different apartment blocks, but last week confirmed it had yet to receive the results of these tests, saying instead that multiple

reports are ongoing and would be finalised in the weeks ahead.

Asked how many single building reports had been completed, it said: “Within the pilot

programme there are multiple surveys ongoing. These reports will be finalised in the coming weeks and will allow us to understand what actions need to be taken to further support homeowners in these buildings.”

The lack of progress in Scotland is in contrast to England, where payments are already under way,

along with work to remove dangerous cladding after the blaze at the London tower block in June 2017 when 72 people died.

Earlier this month UK Housing Secretary Michael Gove announced that developers who refuse to pay the costs of removing unsafe cladding south of the Border could now also have planning permission and projects blocked under new UK

Government plans. New legislatio­n would also allow cladding companies to be sued and face fines for defective products.

The Scottish Government, however, told The Sunday Post it had limited powers to pursue developers and would rely on a share of any money brought in by the Westminste­r scheme, which is expected to eventually be extended to the rest of the UK.

Firefighte­r leaders, safety experts and affected flat owners in Scotland say the response to the situation here has been too slow and are calling for more action.

Ian Sim, regional secretary of the Fire Brigades Union in Scotland, warned: “It’s nearly five years since the Grenfell tragedy,

yet work on removing cladding still has a very long way to go in Scotland – that leaves both the public and firefighte­rs who may have to rescue them from deadly cladding fires in potential danger. There can be no excuse for delays in fixing the building safety problems that have been identified.”

He added: “Westminste­r and Holyrood need to work together to provide urgent action to rectify the areas of concern as everyone in Scotland deserves a decent and safe home.”

The Scottish Government says about 700 high-rise buildings and many smaller buildings have cladding that will need to be checked, but owners and safety experts have criticised the speed of the response.

In the immediate wake of Grenfell, the focus was on buildings over 18 metres in height to require safety checks, but estate

agents in Scotland report a surge in sellers living in low-rise apartments who are being asked by mortgage lenders to provide a specialist EWS1 fire safety certificat­e, which can cost £700£800 plus VAT. And, if major work was then required, the sellers could be left facing a huge bill.

Piers Baylis, a senior property lawyer with BTO Solicitors in Glasgow, said: “Some clients have been unable to sell their homes since the issue arose. They simply cannot afford to fund the cost of works required and in some cases even obtaining an estimate of costs is difficult. Lack of clarity on funding leaves them in limbo or requiring to sell to cash purchasers

only as mortgage providers will not lend, given the uncertaint­y.”

Sean Macfarland, a 43-year-old pilot who has owned his property at Western Harbour in Edinburgh since 2005, said his apartment complex has cladding issues and that if he had to sell up and move it would be problemati­c.

Macfarland said: “I think in the sense that if something was to happen with my job or my wife’s job and we did have to move it would be a big worry because we know in this developmen­t and the others around us that getting a mortgage on the flats is almost impossible, which is having an impact on the price and people’s ability to move.

“Fundamenta­lly, I think that pot of money given to Scotland by the UK Government is just nowhere near enough for them to make any headway.”

Leading fire safety consultant Stephen Mackenzie said he was concerned by the slow progress and called for a dedicated cladding taskforce in Scotland.

“It is disappoint­ing the conversati­on is now all about who will pay, when there are many families whose lives are potentiall­y at risk,” he said.

“But if low-rise buildings are included into the testing schemes at some point, then we would be looking at a problem that could cost anywhere between £2 billion and £10bn pounds to sort, and that would just be to get the ball rolling.

“We are facing a tsunami of safety issues and all these years after Grenfell we haven’t even done a proper audit on our buildings yet. We need a separate claddings taskforce in Scotland to get things moving with a lot more urgency.”

After Grenfell, when combustibl­e cladding was blamed for the swift spread of fire on

the high-rise, a special remedial fund of almost £100 million was given to the Scottish Government to help address the cladding fears. It is believed that Holyrood can expect a further £350m from Westminste­r to deal with the costs of removal and replacemen­t. When asked how much money had been earmarked for dealing with cladding in Scotland, the UK Government said buildings safety was a devolved matter.

The Scottish Government insisted its priority was to help homeowners assess their properties free of charge through its Single Building Assessment pilot and said that money has now started to be paid out for safety checks.

It also pointed out that it had formed a new cladding stakeholde­r group, whose members include the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Housing and Local Government, industry representa­tives and a homeowner representa­tive, which meets monthly to monitor progress in delivering the assessment programme.

It said: “Grants for the first surveys under the scheme have begun to be paid with activity escalating over the coming weeks.

“Once each assessment report is received, we will provide a range of support, including grants, to help people live safely in their homes.”

The government said all of the £97.1m it has received so far would be used to tackle cladding but admitted that levels of future support from Westminste­r remained unclear and said Holyrood also has restricted means of enforcemen­t when it comes to making developers pay up.

“Developers absolutely must take corrective action on buildings that fail to live up to the necessary safety standards,” it added.

“We have limited powers to compel developers and, while we are working with the UK Government on the developmen­t of the UK developer fund, the only fair approach is for UK ministers to allocate a fair share directly to the Scottish Government.”

The High Rise Scotland Action Group said it hoped the UK Government’s plans to target developers will pay off and ease worries of owners.

Scottish Labour housing spokespers­on Mark Griffin, however, described the current cladding situation north of the Border as a “scandal”.

“This has affected the lives of thousands of people across Scotland,” he said. “But the SNP government has entirely failed to act to give proper support to those who have been hit by this scandal.

“We need the SNP to stop passing the buck to Westminste­r and develop clear and effective plans to help Scots in need.”

 ?? ?? Ria Lewis outside her flat in Colonsay View, Edinburgh. Lewis is unable to sell as the flat is said to have unsafe cladding needing to be replaced
Picture Andrew Cawley
Ria Lewis outside her flat in Colonsay View, Edinburgh. Lewis is unable to sell as the flat is said to have unsafe cladding needing to be replaced Picture Andrew Cawley
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Memorial to London tragedy
Memorial to London tragedy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom