The Sunday Post (Newcastle)

Firefighte­rs fear cancer working in dilapidate­d stations with no running water

- By Marion Scott

Firefighte­rs fear they are at increased risk of cancer because so many rural stations are without running water.

Their inability to shower quickly after returning from fires means they cannot properly clean cancercaus­ing chemicals, released during fires, on their clothes and skin.

The Internatio­nal Agency for Research on Cancer, a World Health Organisati­on body, ruled firefighti­ng as one of the most dangerous occupation­s because of exposure to carcinogen­ic substances, with firefighte­rs suffering higher than average cancer rates.

Scottish firefighte­rs fear their cancer risk could be even higher than elsewhere because so many stations are in remote countrysid­e areas and have inadequate facilities to fully decontamin­ate, which requires showering and a full change of clothing within an hour of exposure.

At least 11 of those stations do not have running water. Scottish Fire & Rescue chiefs have issued crews with

“decontamin­ation wipes”, which union bosses say are inadequate given emerging evidence of risks.

Fire Brigade Union Scottish secretary John McKenzie said: “Many rural stations have inadequate facilities and, as a result, we believe exposure has been an unacceptab­le and avoidable risk not only to the health and safety of our firefighte­rs, but also to their families.

“While we welcome the introducti­on of wipes, we do not believe they are nearly enough to protect our members who have been dealing with an unpreceden­ted number of wildfires due to climate change. That means firefighte­rs attending wildfires in the same remote areas where stations don’t have basic facilities such as running water. That means there is nowhere within the workplace for firefighte­rs to fully decontamin­ate, shower and change within an hour of leaving a call-out.

“In the worst cases where there is a lack running water supplies, our members are getting back into their own vehicles to travel home, risking taking with them whatever carcinogen­ic material they may have picked up on the job.

“We fear that has meant family cars being contaminat­ed, and any clothing brought home risks impacting the health of families in much the same way asbestos did when it was brought home by workers years ago.”

Firefighte­rs say budget restraints since Scotland’s single fire service was establishe­d have not only led to the loss of about 1,000 fewer full-time and retained firefighte­rs, but the fabric of many buildings and the standard of facilities at stations have also plummeted.

“Some of our older stations are being held up with internal scaffoldin­g it’s got so bad,” said McKenzie. “Some of the worst staffing shortages are in rural areas where terms and conditions have made it increasing­ly difficult to recruit retained firefighte­rs, so full-time firefighte­rs are increasing­ly having to step in.”

Stations without running water include Colintraiv­e, Cromarty, Foyers, Glenelg, Kerrera Marina, Lybster, North Ronaldsay, Ratagan, Salan, Seil and Staffin.

FBU Scotland health and safety officer Barry Johnstone said: “Our members put

their own lives on the line every single time they attend a call-out, so to expect them to also expose themselves to avoidable risks such as carcinogen­ic material without providing the full facilities to properly allow full decontamin­ation protocol is simply unacceptab­le.”

Cancers of the bladder and mesothelio­ma have been identified by research teams, as well as positive associatio­ns with cancers of the colon and prostate, and for melanoma and nonHodgkin lymphoma. Cancer and disease registers as well as tougher decontamin­ation protocols are being establishe­d.

Professor Anna Stec of Lancaster University, one of the world’s leading experts on exposure to toxic chemicals, warned: “Our firefighte­rs are frequently exposed to high levels of toxic chemicals during and after a fire. As one of the contributo­ry researcher­s, I found firefighte­rs are frequently exposed to carcinogen­s that can have a serious impact on health.

“Members of parliament must call for an urgent debate on firefighte­r health and cancer rates so we can support those who work to save our lives.”

Liz Barnes, Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) director of people and organisati­onal developmen­t, said: “Through our Contaminan­ts Group, we have already taken steps to minimise risk as far as possible. This includes a substantia­l review of how fire appliances, personnel and PPE are decontamin­ated during and following an incident.

“Personnel who may have been exposed to contaminan­ts are encouraged to shower as quickly as possible upon return to station grounds and to safely store PPE for specialist cleaning.

“All existing SFRS buildings have now been audited and reviewed against new design with site-specific control measures to be implemente­d to minimise contaminat­ion. We recognise there are limited welfare facilities at a small number of fire stations across the country and we continue to work to address this.

“Steps taken to mitigate risk include supplying all SFRS appliances and training centres with specialist decontamin­ation wipes and the trial of station zoning systems to limit potential spread. We will continue to explore other steps to minimise risk to our staff.”

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom