The Sunday Telegraph - Sunday

Our damp corner of Norfolk now rivals London for art and culture

-

THE GREAT ESCAPE Hattie Garlick

Looking for Covid’s silver linings is so last lockdown, I know. Since I’m always comfortabl­y situated behind the curve, though, here’s one I’ve recently noted.

I always imagined I’d suffer acute Fomo when we finally left London. Doing so in lockdown, however, has meant all the galleries, theatres and comedy clubs that were formerly on our doorstep have been padlocked and cobwebbed almost continuall­y since we moved. There’s nothing to miss out on. That’s a colossal tragedy for the millions who, just a year ago, were employed in or enjoying the UK’s world-leading art and cultural sector. But… might there be a glimmer of hope for those who, previously, weren’t?

Between 2010-11 and 2018-19, Londoners benefited from £687 each in culture funding. The rest of the UK’s residents received a meagre fifth of that. In fairness, the Arts Council has struggled hard to rebalance this. It just turns out that not that many people are keen to lend their Vermeer to the Ambridge art society when it could hang in the Royal Academy instead.

Thus those living in the countrysid­e make occasional weekend trips to the city instead, bingeing on the arts instead of grazing. We had reconciled ourselves to doing the same. Except that, suddenly, the Globe Theatre’s children’s workshops are happening not in the round, but online. In December, the launch of National Theatre at Home meant we could all watch world-class performanc­es from our sofas for under a tenner a month. In April, the British Museum revealed the largest-ever update to its online collection. It doesn’t matter if you’re in Bloomsbury or Buldoo, you can now see 4.5million objects of global significan­ce, from Damian Hirst portraits to Bronze Age pendants.

But why stop at London’s attraction­s? From our muddy field in Norfolk, we can now teleport to Amsterdam’s Van Gogh Museum, whose lockdownla­unched website exhibits every single one of its paintings, drawings and letters in such fine detail that we can zoom into individual brush strokes. The Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation is running new online programmes while its museums are closed. New York’s Metropolit­an Museum of Art has turned its website inside out, so that previously buried online resources are brought to the surface of its home page.

These new online interactio­ns are no substitute for the real deal. Nothing will ever match the audience experience of sublimatin­g into the darkness as the lights go down, while income from cheap or even free online programmes is a drop in the ocean of financial losses caused to arts organisati­ons by brick and mortar closures. Still, when we crawl out of the Covid era, need the two be mutually exclusive? Couldn’t live arts experience­s be supplement­ed with these newly invigorate­d online resources, boosting revenues and democratis­ing audiences?

The Royal Opera House first began screening live performanc­es at regional cinemas in 2011. More than six million people have now watched one of its production­s on the big screen. Could the current revolution in online arts engagement have a similarly seismic influence? How many people might now try ballet, opera, or abstract expression­ism for the first time while online entry is free and doesn’t involve forking out for a return ticket to London, too?

A lot, it seems. Estimates vary, but less than 10 per cent of audiences at live classical music, opera and ballet performanc­es are likely to be under 31. Since lockdown, the Royal Opera House has been streaming on YouTube and Vimeo as well: 55 per cent of viewers are 44 and under, they tell me, while whole families watching together make up a major component.

And who knows? Maybe one of these kids will be the next José Carreras, selling out concert halls and healing the deep wounds caused to opera by Covid. All because they were able to watch from a sofa on the Shetland Islands.

“I’m fitter than I was at 40” Phil Jeremy, 66, from Marbella

My father, grandfathe­r and greatgrand­father all died aged 59. When I was that age I ran around the rim of the Grand Canyon. Everyone thought I was mad.

Today I’m in better shape than I was in my 40s. I played a bit of football and ate what most people eat, but I had a bit of a stomach on me and I didn’t have the muscular tone I have now.

Then when I turned 54 all that changed. I stopped eating bad stuff and I started running a little bit more, and more. And then I started to do a lot more. I started to do marathons in the mountains.

When you’re doing a 10-hour ultra-marathon you really need to understand the effect that has on your body. So I got a coach and learnt about nutrition.

I’d spent my career as an agent for models and actors, and then late in life, I became a personal trainer.

Now I help people my age, but also people in their 20s and 30s to stay fit.

Running ultramarat­hons isn’t particular­ly good for you, I should say. I wouldn’t recommend it to most people; it’s an extreme thing. Most of my clients just do sprints, because it’s much better for you to do high intensity training.

There’s no point going to the gym for an hour and spending most of that time on your phone. It can be for just 20 minutes but you’ve got to hit it hard.

Most importantl­y, being healthy is about what you eat. Most people just don’t understand that and it’s a shame because they tend to train badly and eat badly but think they’re doing it the right way.

The first thing I do with clients is stop them having sugary breakfasts like cereal, orange juice and too much fruit. It sets you up all wrong for the day. Instead you should have a proteinbas­ed breakfast like eggs.

I suppose I got fit because I was worried about not living past 59, but ultimately my wife and I enjoy feeling healthy and going out and running. We enjoy being able to do these things.

My advice to others is to build up slowly. If you can’t do much, then just try a short sprint up a hill, come back down and try it again, and go from there.

Do some push-ups. Do some squats. It really isn’t that complicate­d. @fitphiltra­ining

There’s no point going to the gym and just looking at your phone

 ??  ?? g Hattie Garlick and her husband, Tom, have been able to enjoy plenty of culture from their new home in Ketteringh­am
g Hattie Garlick and her husband, Tom, have been able to enjoy plenty of culture from their new home in Ketteringh­am
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom