The Sunday Telegraph - Sunday

The reinventio­n of the 60-year-old man

Too old to be a midlifer, too young to be elderly, still aiming for the top – but also ready for a lie-down. Andrew Baker knows the feeling

-

I am 60 this year, and it’s making me think more than any looming birthday has before. People make a lot of fuss about 50, but beyond the mathematic­al fact of the half-century, it’s hard to see why. At 50, I was a middle-aged man, no more and no less. But 60 signals, surely, the end of middle age and the start of something else. What, though?

The range of role models is extraordin­ary. The simple fact that the famous men assembled over these pages are 60 doesn’t surprise me. Unlike Jeremy Clarkson, I am not enraged or perplexed by my age – although, like many middle-aged men, I am grateful to him for demonstrat­ing that one can look like a paunchy wreck and still be twinkly and (sort of) attractive.

I’m not amazed that these guys are 60 – for reasons to do with the laws of physics I have been the same age as them all my life – but look at the variety: Barack Obama, who effortless­ly upstaged his successor at a White House event earlier this month and who many people still wish was the most powerful man in the world; George Clooney, as suave and as seemingly lucrativel­y underemplo­yed as ever; the many others who are notable not only for their remarkable achievemen­ts, but also for their extraordin­ary diversity in outlook, style and appearance.

Let’s be clear: I don’t feel that I am in competitio­n with these fellows. I don’t measure my appearance against Clooney, or my achievemen­ts against Obama – just as well, of course. Nor do I feel obliged to put my musical talents up against Boy George, Billy Ray Cyrus or Axl Rose, take on Tom Ford in the sartorial stakes, or audition against actors Tim Roth, Tom Cruise, Woody

Harrelson and Matthew Broderick, all, like me, 60 this year. I’m not in the same league as this lot, have never aimed to be and it doesn’t bother me that I never will be.

What gives me pause for thought is the many different kinds of man that one can be at 60 – and that is before also considerin­g the unfamous folk who, by definition, don’t figure in any list of celebrity 60-year-olds.

There are a lot of us about. More than ever, in fact. Through the latter half of the 20th century, the population of the UK has been steadily getting older, and the baby boomers and their elders (people of 60 and over) now make up more than 20 per cent of the population – a powerful and relatively wealthy cohort that is still becoming larger, as a segment of the total population, every year. We are numerous, varied and versatile.

I’m sure this wasn’t always the case. My father turned 60 when I was at university in the 1980s. He had just retired from his main career but, unusually for his generation, went on to work as a freelancer for another 25 years. It was much more in character for his contempora­ries to treat 60 as the signpost for the sidelines – time to slip on the Hush Puppies or the golf shoes, light up a pipe of Old Holborn and pop that Val Doonican album on the hi-fi.

Sixty is different now. It’s true that I have friends who have retired to cultivate their gardens, explore ancient buildings or work on their French. But many others are highly, if not always wisely, active: chasing yet another million – or another wife – or chasing their new toddlers around a playground.

Still others are locked in dogged pursuit of new ambitions and new milestones: another mountain to climb, route to cycle, tech innovation to be mastered. And there are one or two who have succumbed along the way to drink and drugs, divorce, remorse and financial chaos.

Some of us – not all, clearly – have learned the Dos and Don’ts of late middle age male life, which mostly revolve

‘What gives me pause for thought is the many different kinds of man that one can be at 60’

around wardrobe… and how to respond to other people’s wardrobes. Twenty-something friends of offspring in skimpy outfits? Don’t gawp. Don’t comment. Creepy old man has never been an attractive lifestyle choice, and if creepy behaviour is less acceptable now than ever before, that’s really no bad thing.

So… where am I in all of this? And how do I measure up? We’ll keep this brisk, to avoid any hint of smugness or suggestion of group therapy. I am healthy, solvent, in full-time employment, happily married and contentedl­y housed. I have grown-up children who not only love but also, I think, like me (and I them, of course).

For all of this I am appropriat­ely, but not loudly, grateful. Is it enough? Do I feel successful? Happy? Fulfilled? Do I feel, crucially, that beyond the age of 60 there are good things yet to come? Have I, not to put too fine point on it, peaked?

Probably. I’m not going to become a CEO – or any kind of O, come to that. I’m unlikely to write the Great Novel or to become significan­tly richer or fitter.

I’m not having the wild time I had when I was 20, but I know how daft I would be to try

And I don’t expect, or want, dramatic romantic adventures with a new love.

I’m not ruling anything out – that would be too depressing. I’ll be happy to try new pastimes, visit new places and acquire new skills. But it’s clear, nonetheles­s, that in many ways this is as good as it is going to get. And that is OK.

The path this far has not always been smooth: I wouldn’t want to revisit my stressy, messy 40s. But after plenty of careful thought in my 50s, and conversati­ons with people older than me who seem to be contented, it belatedly began to dawn on me that the way to be happy, and stay happy, is to align as far as possible what I want with what I can get. Even if the rest of my life looks like what archaeolog­ists sometimes call “managed decline”, at least I am the kind of 60-yearold man that I truly wish to be.

I’m not having such a wild and crazy time as I was when I was 20, but I know how daft I would be to try. And I’m a great deal happier, healthier and less financiall­y frazzled than I was when I was 40, largely because I’m no longer trying to be what I’m not.

As a fortunate 60-year-old man, life is what I make of it, and if I can avoid making an idiot of myself in the process, that will do nicely.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? iAndrew Baker, aged 59¾: is it all ‘managed decline’ from here onwards?
iAndrew Baker, aged 59¾: is it all ‘managed decline’ from here onwards?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom