The Sunday Telegraph

Rule, Britannia! Our new empire of culture is taking the world by storm

From the World Service to the Queen and even Norman Wisdom, Britain punches above its weight in the soft power stakes

- LIBBY PURVES COMMENT on Libby Purves’s view at telegraph.co.uk/comment

Even as the warplanes fly and politician­s talk sanctions, any nation should keep an appreciati­ve and encouragin­g eye on “soft power”, defined by the Harvard academic Joseph Nye as a country’s ability to attract and persuade without coercion, deliberate propaganda or economic pressure, but only culture, image and style. For in this vital area our tiny, creative, rock-bound island punches well above its weight.

It is natural that the vast, wealthy USA should flood the world with superheroe­s, Coca-Cola and the American dream. But the global softpower reach of the UK is a phenomenon all on its own. We begin, of course, with the advantage of language: that English (partly due to Empire but largely to the USA) is a lingua franca is an inestimabl­e boost. It’s the content, however, that counts in the end, and in one significan­t survey of global soft power published last summer (by the polling company ComRes and trumpeted in the

Economist ), we actually came top, beating Germany and the US.

An obvious asset is TV sales: say what you like about ITV’s Downton

Abbey and the image it projects, it certainly spreads that image widely. So do series such as the BBC’s Sherlock , with its loyal Chinese fans, Wolf Hall , and (gulp!) Top Gear . But more basically, the BBC’s 300-million-strong World Service reach in radio as well as TV means offering more than just news – it shares a viewpoint and a civilised gentleness, speaking through the humblest hand-cranked radio in remote villages and fragile regimes.

Years ago, working at Bush House (then the World Service HQ), I had a friend visiting for a canteen supper and pointed out a couple of its announcers at the next table. She wept: she had been working in Angola during the recent civil war, and those calm voices had been – for her and the villagers she sheltered with – not only the one source of reliable news but “the only reassuranc­e that there was a sane world somewhere”.

Today the BBC World Service broadcasts in 29 languages and on diverse platforms and relays – and there are even plans to add Nigerian Pidgin and Yoruba services. Some 188 million people a week hear it. For all the irritation one can feel with the BBC, this is one of our greatest, and least compromise­d hands reaching out to the world.

The Coalition’s absurd decision – accepted by the easily rolled-over director-general Mark Thompson – to stop subsidisin­g it and make the licence fee pay it all, has been partly reversed this autumn as George Osborne puts back £85 million. It needs it, to compete with the increasing number of broadcaste­rs in the control of lands with “a democratic deficit”: North Korea, Russianspe­aking areas, the Middle East and Africa. It’s money well spent: and editorial control, vitally, remains with the BBC.

So that’s one big, obvious soft-power source. Another is the utter fascinatio­n with our Royal family: evinced in visits, but also in huge overseas coverage. Our regal ceremonies rivet the world, and now there is a new generation of more intimate views: Royal babies, Harry’s high jinks and kindliness, and the Duchess of Cambridge’s fashion choices. For fashion itself is a big export: a world that does not necessaril­y see our more shambling High Street landscape has convinced itself thereby that we are pretty chic.

Sport matters, too: we may not be as heavily garlanded with gold medals as others but every joyful, quirky gesture from Mo Farah helps to convince the world that we are not racist or Islamophob­ic, and the jaunty return of Jessica Ennis-Hill to hurdles and the heptathlon as a new mother tells the world that we are bold triers.

Almost more than anything, though, we export the arts – including subversive, anti-government arts. That sense of free voices either appreciati­ng or challengin­g Britain itself is a heady message. A sense of the people rather than the state speaking to the world is met with delight. Splendid that the play The Audience was a hit on Broadway, with its meditative fictional account of the Queen’s interactio­n with seven decades of prime ministers, and splendid, too, the historic appreciati­on of The King’s Speech . But note also that among our many Tony Award nomination­s (31 this year alone) are very different images: Mike Bartlett’s King Charles III was rather less reverent towards the institutio­n; David Hare’s Skylight is hardly propaganda for a perfect Britain. Nor was Jez Butterwort­h’s Jerusalem .

Actors as different as Mark Rylance, Hugh Grant and James Corden have been feted across the Atlantic in recent months – the best joke being that James Corden, whose brilliantl­y shambolic portrayal in One Man, Two

Guvnors appears among other things to have charmed (perhaps due to her British roots) the world’s least shambolic, most tightly sartoriall­y controlled and revered US fashion personalit­y, Anna Wintour of Vogue .

But America isn’t everything: its Anglophili­a is reliable enough, give or take a bit of friendly mutual mockery. More startling is the brilliant global reach of NT Live, the cinema relays pioneered by the National Theatre under Nicholas Hytner and Nick Starr. It only began in 2009, across the UK and with the National’s own production­s, but rapidly included other theatres such as the Donmar, the Young Vic, the RSC at the Barbican and recently, with a recent strange and riveting Complicité show, the Theatre Royal Plymouth. By this time the screenings had spread across Europe: to see queues in Prague and Milan for The Curious Incident of the Dog in the

Night-Time was surreal. Now 22 countries take it: in different time zones such as Australia and China the plays filmed live are shown at different times, but with the same buzz.

Again, the important thing is that they have independen­ce. There is some government arts subsidy – which repays itself several times over in exports, and is always being pared back – but the freedom of thought, the anger and mockery and philosophi­cal exploratio­n and powerful humanity of current UK theatre sends a message about us across the world that should be honoured. British theatre draws on our own experience but on the world’s, too, reflecting it back to its origins: so the world sees live-filmed

relays of both Jane Eyre and Les Liaisons Dangereuse­s , As You Like It and Of Mice and Men , Treasure Island and Medea . And that’s before we even start on the operas.

We should be proud, though not smug, about soft power “that gives delight and hurts not”. Proud of plays and films and novels and TV exports, of Adele sweeping the world with wistful songs, and the merry racket of Status Quo still rockin’ all over the world; of royal ceremonial and royal infants, agitprop and anger and jokes and fashion and charity (Red Nose Day has now reached the US).

Shout, too, for the ongoing commercial successes: Colman’s mustard and Stilton on distant tables spreading a kind of peace and goodwill. The pleasure of “soft power” is that it is such an unguided missile: you never know what hook will catch.

I remember Romanian friends, fresh from the fall of Ceausescu, standing in a Suffolk lane reciting the whole of Kipling’s “If ”, which they said had seen them through the bad times of hearing the truths they’d spoken “twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools”. And there is something fortifying about rememberin­g what a massive hero in Albania was the late Norman Wisdom: in the dictatorsh­ip of Enver Hoxha his slapstick comedies were the only Western films allowed, being considered a parable of class war because the little man always won. When he died, the new prime minister called Sir Norman “one of the dearest friends of our nation”.

That’s the British way – our soft power makes us dear friends all the world over.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom