The Sunday Telegraph

EU scores an own-goal by refusing to talk trade in Brexit negotiatio­ns

-

SIR – The EU Commission is being deliberate­ly obtuse in refusing to discuss customs and trade arrangemen­ts.

How can the Irish border issue be resolved until we know whether there will be a free-trade agreement? And what customs arrangemen­ts will be in place between Britain and the rest of the EU? Does Michel Barnier expect a separate system unique to Ireland?

The Commission discusses first what it sees as most important – its own budget and the spending it controls. Trade and jobs are important only to EU citizens, so they must wait their turn. Ken Worthy

Esher, Surrey

SIR – Christophe­r Booker (The Last Word, August 13) says that, following Brexit, there will be no more Irish horses competing at Cheltenham, as a result of the new procedures which will be necessary at the border.

How is it, then, that American horses seem to be able to come and go as they please – and competed successful­ly at Royal Ascot earlier this year? Roger Hopkins

Eastbourne, East Sussex

SIR – The EU members’ demands in the Brexit talks have been, by and large, unwarrante­d and greedy.

Meanwhile, it would seem France has chosen to forget how it was treated when it withdrew from the Nato military command structures (while remaining in the planning arrangemen­ts). The country wanted sole control of its force de frappe nuclear weapons.

In 1948 France had become a full member of Nato and accepted the financial obligation­s. These included the funding of infrastruc­ture projects, military operations, joint staff, research, and all other aspects of a successful defensive alliance.

Before departing, the French were presented with a bill reflecting previously agreed future financial obligation­s. Needless to say, they objected – so strongly, in fact, that the Nato council decided it was preferable to have a “friendly ally”, and so waived the bill, though France continued to pay appropriat­e membership costs.

Undoubtedl­y, France was treated in a benevolent manner by its Nato allies, and both parties benefited accordingl­y.

Might we might now ask France to adopt a similar stance in response to our desire to leave the EU while retaining certain benefits? If it is able to convince its EU partners of the wisdom of a friendly and cooperativ­e approach to Brexit negotiatio­ns, it will have delivered a great benefit to Europe, Britain – and, dare I say, to the rest of the world. Brian Weatherley

Salisbury, Wiltshire

SIR – If we pay “compensati­on” to the EU for allowing us to leave, please could this be taken from our bloated foreign aid budget? Michael Staples

Seaford, East Sussex

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom