The Sunday Telegraph

Parents’ trust ‘betrayed’ as health body fails to publish vaccine test result

- By Henry Bodkin

THE failure of England’s public health body to publish results of three major studies into vaccines for children makes it impossible for experts to establish whether the drugs could be harmful, scientists have claimed.

Hundreds of children took part in three potentiall­y risky government drug trials, but Public Health England (PHE) breached the law by failing to add the findings to the official register set up to allow the scientific community to scrutinise the outcomes.

Experts have accused PHE of an “incomprehe­nsible” violation of the trust of parents who gave consent for their children to take part in the tests. The largest trial involved 640 participan­ts under the age of 16, whose parents gave consent for them to be selected at random to try a new meningococ­cal and whooping cough booster vaccine.

While dangerous side-effects in a trial at this stage are rare, a risk does exist. Participan­ts also take a gamble by offering themselves for selection for a new drug that might not protect them as well as the standard therapy.

The trial concluded in 2016, but the results have not yet appeared on the EU Clinical Trials Register (EUCTR) – a breach of EU law, which requires registrati­on within 12 months – nor published anywhere else. The failure to register means there is no way for the public to know how the children fared.

Last night, Dr Ben Goldacre, the Oxford academic whose analysis revealed the PHE omission, told The Sunday Telegraph: “It is incomprehe­nsible to me for Public Health England, of all the trials it could leave unreported, to have failed to comply with the legal requiremen­ts to report trials of vaccines, when patients participat­e and take a risk with their own health.

“We have to respect their contributi­on by publishing the results properly. If we don’t, that is a betrayal of trust.”

The EUCTR was set up partly to counter the tendency of many scientific journals, the traditiona­l mode of publicatio­n, to polish results, downplayin­g the therapies that failed.

The transparen­cy it affords is supposed to promote confidence in science at a time where the “anti-vax” movement – those who argue that vaccines are useless and actually cause disease – is buoyant.

Andrew Wakefield, the discredite­d British doctor whose fraudulent research prompted a scare that the MMR vaccine causes autism, is enjoying widespread support in the US and a boost from sympatheti­c comments by President Donald Trump.

“Withholdin­g the results of a clinical trial makes a mockery of all our efforts to promote trust in medicine, and I’m particular­ly sad to see vaccine trials going unreported,” said Dr Goldacre.

A second PHE trial, which concluded in 2010, investigat­ed the effectiven­ess of a meningitis C vaccine in a group of 130 one-year-olds, while a third, which concluded in 2011, involved 75 adults trialing a meningitis B vaccine.

PHE said the results of these studies had been published in academic journals, while results of the larger 640patient trial are “still being analysed”.

The omission by PHE forms part of a bigger picture of widespread disregard for the registrati­on law.

Dr Goldacre’s research via his website (eu.trialstrac­ker.net) shows that, of the 7,274 trials where results have been due, only 49.5 per cent reported them. However, no organisati­on has ever been sanctioned for breaching the law.

The research showed that pharmaceut­ical companies tended to comply more than academic institutio­ns, with 68 per cent of company-sponsored trials reporting their results, compared with 11 per cent from universiti­es.

Fergus Sweeney, the head of inspection­s at the European Medicines Agency, said: “This study helps spread the word on how important it is to post trial results once a clinical trial is over.

“We at EMA are firm believers that transparen­cy and public availabili­ty and scrutiny of clinical trial informatio­n and results are fundamenta­l for the protection and promotion of public health.”

49.5pc The proportion of clinical trials where results were reported, according to eu.trialstrac­ker.net

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom