The Sunday Telegraph

Humphrys’ outdated views betray men’s sense of parenting loss

-

John Humphrys leaves the Radio 4 Today programme this autumn. He will not sign off, however, without a last gasp of what I call his soft – his gently oblivious – misogyny. He is not a monster, of course. He is civilised, educated, refined – but, ah, he is grumpy.

Almost nothing he seems to think about women is relevant now. He is 75, born in an age when women were rarely invited into the national conversati­on: and it shows. He has been in the company of powerful men for too long: that shows, too. He once asked me, on air, whether I make enough effort with my appearance. I don’t – but what is that to him?

This week, he did an item about an advert for Philadelph­ia cheese, which was banned after 128 complaints. The advert showed “new dads” looking after babies, and placing them in danger by being too interested in Philadelph­ia cheese – which seems unlikely, but we are talking about advertisin­g. He oraculated at an unfortunat­e woman from the Advertisin­g Standards Agency: “A woman looking after a baby is, by any estimate, a very, very good and desirable thing for society.” That’s not too bad. Then this: “Maybe I will be attacked for this. You [women] do a better job at it than men. At least in most of our experience, I would have thought.” The interestin­g phrase there is “in most of our experience”. He

means in his experience, and in that tossed-away phrase – he has three children – I saw loss. Others will see entitlemen­t.

The nonsense that fathers cannot be committed and tender parents to babies – that men cannot do it better than women – is just that: nonsense. I watch modern fathers, my own husband, for instance, act like “convention­al” mothers to their babies. They are filled with patience, curiosity and love. That women do it better is a devious compliment designed to protect men from having to do something they might consider dull. It is the same with housework; as men plead ignorance women do it, as if it is a spiritual experience only they get to have.

I once asked my husband to wash the floor. Moments later, he was clutching a bloody toenail and bellowing, as blood leaked from his foot. It is an insidious myth that men cannot wash floors. He believes it; he shed blood for it. It is the same for childcare.

This is a tragedy for thwarted women hungry to work outside of the home; for men who want to be full-time carers but feel mocked; for men who miss out on that wonderful intimacy; for children. A treasured memory of my son’s babyhood was watching his great-uncle give him his bottle. Men built a civilisati­on; they are quite capable of cherishing babies.

 ??  ?? Missing out: John Humphrys showed his lack of baby care
Missing out: John Humphrys showed his lack of baby care

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom