One in four ‘child’ migrants is 18 or older
Age assessments find many who claim to be children after Channel crossing to Kent are actually adults
A QUARTER of migrants and refugees who claim to be children after crossing the Channel in small boats to reach England are in fact judged to be 18 or older, it can be disclosed.
Age assessments carried out by social workers have concluded that around 25 per cent of unaccompanied “child” migrants who make the crossing are older than they claim.
Many believe they will get preferential treatment if they are treated as children by UK immigration authorities.
But figures obtained by The Sunday Telegraph have shown that of the 1,668 who claimed to be children after landing on the Kent coast in the past five years after making the treacherous journey in small boats and dinghies from France, more than 400 have later been assessed to be over 18. A source at Kent county council told The Sunday
Telegraph: “Following age assessment, around 25 per cent are assessed as being 18 or over. They will then almost definitely appeal this through the courts and the council pays all the legal fees.”
Refugee campaign groups dispute the figures, claiming the assessment process is unscientific and arbitrary. The revelations come after the death of a refugee named as Abdulfatah Hamdallah, whose body was found washed up on a beach at Sangatte, near Dunkirk, last week after the inflatable dinghy in which he was sailing sank.
His 16-year-old companion, who survived, said Hamdallah had suggested he was also 16, but documents found on his body showed he was aged 28.
Originally from West Kordofan, a Sudanese state bordering the war-torn areas of Darfur and the Nuba Mountains, Hamdallah is understood to have fled his country in 2014, spending two years in Libya with his older brother before heading to France.
Had he made it to Britain and been detained by HM Coastguard and Border Force officials, he would have been interviewed and assessed by social workers to determine his real age.
The Telegraph has established that Kent is now transferring new arrivals to local authorities around the country, as it can no longer cope with the influx.
The council announced on Aug 14 that it had reached its capacity for the safe care for new arrivals of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and was unable to accept any new arrivals.
Kent is currently responsible for 602 under-18-year-olds who were detained after crossing the Channel, many of whom have been placed with foster carers in the country. The cost of looking after these children has placed a strain on Kent’s coffers, costing its council tax payers £200,000 a month.
At the same time, another 950 arrivals, aged 18 to 25 have been given temporary accommodation and assisted living. Since June 1, Kent has had to transfer 111 UASCs to other local authorities.
Norfolk county council has agreed to take 36 new unaccompanied children in the past few weeks and is hiring contract social workers to assess their needs and determine their true age.
Those deemed to be under 18 will be entitled to local authority-funded assistance with accommodation and living assistance up until they are 25.
Those found to be over 18 will be returned to the care of the Home Office to determine whether they qualify for refugee status. If not, they will be returned to their countries of origin, a process that can take several years after appeals under human rights law.
Since the start of the year, a total of 4,999 refugees and would-be migrants have been detained after arriving in the UK on small boats across the Channel, many of them originally from wartorn countries such as Syria and Sudan.
Kent Refugee Action Network said: “Age assessments are imprecise, subjective and arbitrary. In fact, the problem is not people pretending to be younger than they are, it’s age assessments that often put them as older than they are, and that has devastating consequences, leading to children in foster care being moved to adult accommodation.”
The Coram Children’s Legal Centre said: “Age determination is an inexact science, and the margin of error can sometimes be as much as five years either side, especially around the time of puberty. There is no single reliable method for making precise estimates, and no conclusive medical test.”