The Sunday Telegraph

Why can’t the Government find more Conservati­ves to run public bodies?

- TOM WELSH H FOLLOW Tom Welsh on Twitter @TWWelsh

Left-wing Twitter activists are determined to see a conspiracy in the appointmen­t of Dido Harding to head the new National Institute for Health Protection. A Conservati­ve peer, she is married to the Tory MP John Penrose, who sits on the advisory board of a small think tank called 1828. This think tank has apparently argued in the past for replacing the NHS with an insurance model; so, the logic goes, Baroness Harding’s new role is part of a sinister plot by the Government to parachute in Right-wing radicals to dismantle the welfare state and quietly launch a new free-market revolution.

Alas, the truth is rather more disappoint­ing, and not solely because this is the most NHS-worshippin­g government in recent history. With a few honourable exceptions, ministers are continuing the trend of filling public appointmen­ts with people who are not in any way recognisab­ly conservati­ve.

The latest example is the man chosen by Grant Shapps to lead his new “accelerati­on unit”. The Transport Secretary has formed this unit in order to find ways of speeding up the “delivery” of infrastruc­ture projects. It is plainly needed. The news came on the same day that it was announced that Crossrail is being postponed yet again, at a cost of a few more hundred million, and as all the while HS2 continues to break records for profligacy.

So why did Shapps consider

Grant Shapps’s latest appointmen­t to run his accelerati­on unit is Darren Shirley. On his Twitter account, Mr Shirley lists his former affiliatio­ns as Which, WWF and Greenpeace

Darren Shirley to be the right person to run the unit? Shirley was previously head of the Campaign for Better Transport, a pressure group which has advocated against roadbuildi­ng, called for the ban on new petrol and diesel cars to be brought forward, and which is fully signed up to the “sustainabi­lity” agenda, often a code word for policies that make private car ownership so intolerabl­e as to force people to find other ways of getting around.

In a recent report, it supported the Government’s Covid “emergency” decision to allow local authoritie­s to reduce road space without consulting residents. This, you might recall, is the policy responsibl­e for turning scores of streets into dead-ends, underminin­g high streets just as they try to recover from lockdown, and provoking a popular revolt across the country against ill-thought-through measures that campaigner­s say are worsening both congestion and air pollution. On his Twitter account, Shirley describes himself as ex-Which, ex-WWF and ex-Greenpeace.

So why Shirley? I am not calling for some sort of modern-day Test Act, and it is a fallacy that appointing a Tory-supporting businesspe­rson is an instant solution to the many problems caused by the quango state, as we are likely to discover with Baroness Harding. But given that we have elected a Conservati­ve government, the least we are entitled to expect are appointees who support measures that accord with the interests of Conservati­ve voters. In fact, Shirley’s appointmen­t is all the more worrying because he appears to be in complete agreement with government policy, which has a tendency to embrace every eco-fantasy going.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom