The Sunday Telegraph

Aid group refuses no-sex clause for workers

Blindness charity still allows relationsh­ips with recipients despite curbs on Government employees

- By Mason Boycott-Owen

ONE of the Government’s foreign aid partners is refusing to ban sex with aid recipients despite the Oxfam scandal, The Sunday Telegraph can disclose.

An investigat­ion found that Sightsaver­s, which provides internatio­nal developmen­t work for the blind and visually impaired, does not stop its staff having a sexual relationsh­ip with those who receive aid. Instead, it bans “any form of exploitati­ve or abusive relationsh­ip with a beneficiar­y” but “it is entirely possible” staff could be in “completely normal and consensual relationsh­ips”.

It came after The Telegraph revealed the Government was to ban all its direct employees from having sexual relationsh­ips with aid recipients, terming it “gross misconduct”, whereas before it was only “strongly discourage­d.” The Foreign Commonweal­th and Developmen­t Office said this did not extend to its contracted partners, which had their own policies.

Sarah Champion MP, chairman of the Internatio­nal Developmen­t Committee, said relationsh­ips between aid workers and those they help cannot be completely consensual.

She said: “In 2018 the Government led an internatio­nal summit on tackling sexual violence in the aid sector. They’re now being made to look like hypocrites by the companies they subcontrac­t aid work to. There is always a power imbalance between aid workers and beneficiar­ies. So for the avoidance of doubt, I would prevent all sexual relationsh­ips, as consent would never be clear cut.

“The Government needs to show zero tolerance to sexual exploitati­on of aid beneficiar­ies; if their subcontrac­tors can’t guarantee that, don’t fund them.”

Two other organisati­ons partnered with the Government also did not ban the practice, instead saying they were committed to stopping transactio­nal, abusive or exploitati­ve relationsh­ips.

The three organisati­ons – Mott MacDonald, the London School of Economics and Sightsaver­s – said their policies did not class all sexual relationsh­ips by staff as gross misconduct.

A Sightsaver­s spokesman said: “Anyone involved in any form of exploitati­ve or abusive relationsh­ip with a beneficiar­y will be sacked. No ifs or buts.”

A spokesman for Mott MacDonald said: “We are committed to eradicatin­g abusive, exploitati­ve and harassing behaviours throughout the aid sector and are driving forward efforts to raise standards in humanitari­an assistance and internatio­nal developmen­t work.”

The LSE said: “The contract with

FCDO contains relevant safeguardi­ng clauses in relation to workers terms and conditions. This includes sexual misconduct in its definition of ‘serious’ or gross misconduct. The relevant safeguardi­ng clauses specifical­ly refer to transactio­nal sex, which includes with those receiving aid, as serious misconduct.” The FCDO said it would take “swift action” if it found an organisati­on not upholding its standards.

In 2018, Oxfam was embroiled in a scandal in which several staff were sacked after allegation­s of sexual exploitati­on in earthquake-stricken Haiti.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom