The Sunday Telegraph

Duke of York removed from 47 patronages

Charities rush to distance themselves from Quuen’s son over links with dead paedophile Epstein

- By Victoria Ward and Lizzie Roberts

THE Duke of York has been removed as patron of almost 50 organisati­ons, The Sunday Telegraph can disclose, despite his expressed intention to one day return to public life.

The proportion of his charities and organisati­ons, thought to be at least one in four, that opted to sever ties following the Duke’s friendship with the late convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, underlines the scale of the damage to his reputation.

Many, particular­ly those working with children, felt it was “no longer appropriat­e” to continue their associatio­ns with him. Others said they had determined to find a representa­tive “better suited” to their aims and values.

When the Duke, 61, announced on in November 2019 that he was “stepping back from public duties for the foreseeabl­e future” following the furore over his disastrous Newsnight interview, many of his charities found themselves in a difficult position.

Several took the decision to end their associatio­n with immediate effect. They included the Royal National Institute for the Deaf, the Golf Foundation, the Children’s Foundation, the Outward

Bound Trust and the British Science Associatio­n. The Royal Navy and Royal Marines Children’s Fund said: “We felt that as a children’s charity it was not appropriat­e for him to remain patron.”

Others such as Berkshire County Cricket Club, the Society for Nautical Research, the Associatio­n of Leading Visitor Attraction­s and Whitgift School in Croydon, also severed ties. Around 200 charities and organisati­ons are said to have the Duke’s backing.

Of around 150 contacted by The Telegraph, 47 confirmed they had ended their affiliatio­n with him. Many declined to respond or opted not to comment, suggesting the subject remains highly sensitive.

Of those who had severed ties, the majority said they had not yet replaced him. However, many said they were hoping to recruit individual­s more aligned to their aims. Only three, the British Science Associatio­n, the Council of British Internatio­nal Schools and the Tall Ships Youth Trust, said they had contacted Buckingham Palace in the hope of finding a new royal patron.

The Royal Philharmon­ic Orchestra and the York Minster Fund have confirmed that they replaced the Duke as royal patron with his brother, the Prince of Wales. Others felt they should cut ties with the Duke but felt unable to do so as he had not been charged or convicted of any crime. Instead of formally parting ways, they removed his portrait from the wall, deleted his name from their website and, in one case, concealed a plaque bearing his name behind a plant.

Those confirming that they have maintained links with the Duke, whilst accepting that he cannot engage in any activity on their behalf, include the Royal Liverpool Golf Club, the Friends of the Staffordsh­ire Regiment, Morayvia Aerospace Centre and Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust.

The Telegraph investigat­ion found that a lack of contact from Buckingham Palace about the unfolding events in 2019 had caused significan­t confusion.

Several organisati­ons, having heard nothing directly from the Duke’s office, believed that when he stepped back, he had in fact, stepped down. Fire Sport UK said it assumed that the Duke had resigned and that it would be notified in due course who would take on the role.

The Foundation for Liver Research also said that it was their understand­ing that he was no longer their patron.

Tim Ward, a trustee of the Friends of Lakefield College School, which the Duke attended in 1978, said that when the Duke stepped back for the foreseeabl­e future, “we considered that the end of the patronage.” He was removed from its website and note paper.

A Buckingham Palace source acknowledg­ed that the Duke’s individual patronages had not been contacted. “The announceme­nt of the Duke of York stepping back received widespread attention and many patronages were quick to get in touch,” they said.

“Since then, patronages wishing to discuss the impact on their operations have been dealt with as they arose.”

Many charities noted that the Royal family’s website, listing the Duke as patron of 136 charities and organisati­ons, was out of date.

The Duke’s fall from grace was prompted by his BBC Two Newsnight interview in which he insisted he had no recollecti­on of meeting Virginia Roberts Giuffre, one of Epstein’s victims who claims she was forced to have sex with the Duke. The Duke has always denied these claims.

He said he had asked the Queen for permission to “step back from public duties for the foreseeabl­e future.”

A spokespe spokespers­on for the Duke of York declined to co comment.

 ??  ?? The Duke of York announced he would step back from public duties after his disastrous TV interview in 2019
The Duke of York announced he would step back from public duties after his disastrous TV interview in 2019

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom