The Sunday Telegraph

Mathematic­ian who fled the Nazis, then invented the H-bomb and AI

THE MAN FROM THE FUTURE by Ananyo Bhattachar­ya

- By Simon Ings

368pp, Allen Lane, £20, ebook £9.99 ★★★★★

Neumann János Lajos, born in Budapest in 1903 to a wealthy Jewish family, negotiated some of the most lethal traps set by the 20th century, and did so with breathtaki­ng grace. A mathematic­ian with a vice-like memory, he survived, and saved others from, the rise of Nazism. He left Austria and joined Princeton’s Institute for Advanced Study when he was just 29. He worked on ballistics in the Second World War, and atom and hydrogen bombs in the Cold War. Disturbed yet undaunted by the prospect of nuclear armageddon, he still found time to develop game theory, to rubbish economics, and to establish artificial intelligen­ce as a legitimate discipline. He died plain “Johnny von Neumann”, in 1957, at the Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in Washington, surrounded by heavy security in case, in his final delirium, he spilled any state secrets.

Following John von Neumann’s life is rather like playing chess against a computer: he has all the best moves already figured out. “A time traveller,” his biographer Ananyo Bhattachar­ya calls him in The Man from the Future, “quietly seeding ideas that he knew would be needed to shape the Earth’s future.” Mathematic­ian Rózsa Péter’s assessment of his powers is even more unsettling: “Other mathematic­ians prove what they can,” she declared. “Von Neumann proves what he wants.”

He had the knack (if we can use so casual a word) of reducing a dizzying variety of seemingly intractabl­e technical dilemmas to problems in logic. In Vienna, he learned how to think systematic­ally about mathematic­s, using step-by-step, mechanical procedures. Later he used that insight to play midwife to the computer. In between he rendered the new-fangled quantum theory halfway comprehens­ible (by explaining how Heisenberg’s and Schrödinge­r’s wildly different quantum models said the same thing); then, at Los Alamos, he helped perfect the atom bomb and co-invented the unimaginab­ly more powerful H-bomb.

He isn’t even dull! The worst you can point to is some mild OCD: Johnny fiddles a bit too long with the light switches. Otherwise – what? He enjoys a drink. He enjoys fast cars. He’s jolly. You can imagine having a drink with him. He’d certainly make you feel comfortabl­e. Here’s Edward Teller in 1966: “Von Neumann would carry on a conversati­on with my three-year-old son, and the two of them would talk as equals, and I sometimes wondered if he used the same principle when he talked to the rest of us.” Not even a painful divorce could dent his reputation for charm, reliabilit­y and kindness.

In embarking on his biography of von Neumann, Bhattachar­ya sets himself a considerab­le challenge: writing about a man who, through crisis after crisis, through stormy intellectu­al disagreeme­nts and amid political controvers­y, contrived always, for his own sake and others’, to avoid unnecessar­y drama. What’s a biographer to do, when part of his subject’s genius is his ability to blend in with his friends and lead a good life? How to dramatise a man without flaws, who skates through life without any of the personal turmoil that makes for gripping storytelli­ng?

If some lives resist the storytelle­r’s art, Bhattachar­ya does a cracking job of hiding the fact. He sensibly, and ably, moves the biographic­al goal-posts, making this not so much the story of a flesh-and-blood man, more the story of how an intellect evolves, moving as intellects often do (though rarely so spectacula­rly) from theoretica­l concerns to their applicatio­n to their philosophy. “As he moved from pure mathematic­s to physics to economics to engineerin­g,” observed former colleague Freeman Dyson, “[Von Neumann] became steadily less deep and steadily more important.”

Von Neumann did not really trust humanity to live up, morally, to its technical capacities. “What we are creating now,” he told his wife, after a sleepless night contemplat­ing an H-bomb design, “is a monster whose influence is going to change history, provided there is any history left.” He

He died surrounded by heavy security lest he spill state secrets in his final delirium

was a quintessen­tially European pessimist, forged by years that saw the world he had grown up in being utterly destroyed. It was no mere cynic, though, who wrote, “We will be able to go into space way beyond the moon if only people could keep pace with what they create.”

Bhattachar­ya’s agile, intelligen­t, intellectu­ally enraptured account of Von Neumann’s life reveals, after all, not “a man from the future”, not a one-dimensiona­l cold-war warrior and for sure not Dr Strangelov­e (though Peter Sellers nicked his accent). Bhattachar­ya argues convincing­ly that Von Neumann was a man in whose extraordin­arily fertile head the pre-war world found a lifeboat.

To order a copy for £16.99, call 0844 871 1514 or visit books.telegraph.co.uk

 ?? ?? Going nuclear: John von Neumann helped perfect atom and hydrogen bombs
Going nuclear: John von Neumann helped perfect atom and hydrogen bombs
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom