The Sunday Telegraph

Energy from biomass plant triple the cost of alternativ­es

‘Eye-wateringly expensive’ power from delayed facility will far outstrip price of wind and solar, critics say

- By Emma Gatten ENVIRONMEN­T EDITOR

ENERGY from a long-delayed biomass plant will cost almost three times as much as new wind and solar power and could ultimately push up bills, analysis for The Sunday Telegraph has found.

The MGT Teesside plant, which is set to begin operating this year, will burn wooden pellets to create enough electricit­y to power 600,000 homes.

It was due to open in 2018 and failed to meet a deadline to come online last December. This has since been extended by the Government-owned Low Carbon Contracts Company until the end of this year.

But the plant has been criticised as costly and inefficien­t. Once online, it will produce electricit­y at an agreed price of £147.45 per megawatt hour (MWh).

Renewable energy producers receive an agreed price for their power, which the Government tops up when wholesale electricit­y prices drop below this figure. The excess is added to the green levies included in consumer bills.

When electricit­y prices are higher than the agreed sum, producers pay the difference back to the Government.

The price for the MGT Teesside plant is nearly three times the cost of new offshore wind projects, which have a cap in forthcomin­g Government Contracts for Difference auctions of £54 per Mwh.

Lord Randall of Uxbridge, a Conservati­ve peer, said the approach to biomass should be reconsider­ed.

“We need to rethink our approach to bioenergy,” he said. “It is expensive and the environmen­tal benefits are questionab­le. It’s difficult to justify these subsidies at a time of rising energy bills, especially when genuinely clean energy sources are significan­tly cheaper.”

Phil MacDonald, CEO at think tank Ember, said: “This is a story of an obsolete technology limping along thanks to misguided government largesse.

“Biomass is an eye-wateringly expensive way of generating power. This money could have been spent on wind and solar, which are so cheap they now act to lower energy bills.

“The Government is backing a dead horse here, and energy bills will go up as a result.”

While wholesale electricit­y prices are at record highs because of the global cost of gas, the project is likely to pay money back to the Government.

But as prices come down to more stable levels of around £50-£60 per MWh, the Teesside plant could receive an annual subsidy of around £180 million-£200million, equivalent to £2.20£2.50 per household, according to analysis by the website Carbon Brief for The Telegraph. That stands in contrast to new wind and solar projects, which are expected to continue receiving zero or negative subsidies.

Biomass has come under increased scrutiny over its emissions and environmen­tal impact. The industry receives green subsidies worth more than £2million a day because it is classed as renewable and carbon neutral.

But scientists and environmen­talists argue that the industry, which burns millions of tons of imported wood pellets yearly, is harming forests and producing significan­t short-term carbon emissions. The biomass industry says it only uses wood pellets in accordance with the strictest sustainabi­lity criteria.

MGT Teesside did not respond to requests for comment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom