The Sunday Telegraph

Does psychiatry have a future? Only if it realises its limitation­s

- By Simon Ings To order for £19.99 call 0844 871 1514 or visit books.telegraph.co.uk

DESPERATE REMEDIES by Andrew Scull

494pp, Allen Lane, £25, ebook £12.99

★★★★★

AFollowing the Second World War, just about everything was blamed on the parents

re mental illnesses real? Well, says Andrew Scull, in his erudite, precise, blistering­ly critical history of 200 years of psychiatry, they hurt; they blight lives; now and again they kill people. So there’s that.

But are they illnesses in any recognisab­le sense? They can’t be cured. Some people, after years of suffering, experience complete remission for no reason. The search for reliable genetic markers for schizophre­nia and major depression has proved a snark-hunt. And so on: Scull’s new book, Desperate Remedies, is the story of what happens when the world stubbornly refuses to reward our efforts at rational understand­ing.

There are two traditions in psychiatry. The first, greatly shaped by our experience with syphilis, assumes that mental illness is an organic failing, perhaps the result of an infection. Henry Cotton is the unlovely posterchil­d of this tendency, a man whose fin de siècle war on “focal infection” involved the surgical removal of teeth and tonsils first of all, then colons and cervixes, and then just about anything his knife could reach – and killed very nearly half his clientele.

The other tradition, mindful especially of those traumatise­d by war, assumes that mental illness is grounded in individual experience. At its psychoanal­ytic height, in the 20 years following the Second World War, it could blame just about everything on the parents. The psychoanal­yst Franz Alexander believed that “the asthmatic wheeze was the ‘suppressed cry’ of a patient suffocated by an over-attentive mother”. The current crop of trauma therapies – springing from the roots of 1960s-era PTSD, like mushrooms after a spring rain – is the latest lurid flowering of this tradition.

Meanwhile psychiatri­sts, the poor bloody footsoldie­rs in this intellectu­al conflict, have been treating ordinary people in oversubscr­ibed, underfunde­d institutio­ns – or in the absence of those institutio­ns, where “care in the community” holds sway. It’s their “desperate remedies”, from shock therapies to lobotomies, that form the core of this book.

Scull spends many pages explaining what happens when overambiti­ous clinicians meet clients deprived of their rights. (Not everyone in the profession is a Nurse Ratched, but it’s worth rememberin­g that One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest was drawn from Ken Kesey’s personal experience.) In spite of everything, Scull still holds out the narrow possibilit­y that psychiatry has a future, if only it would calm down and own up to its limitation­s. In the psychophar­mological present, for instance, much that we’re told “works” doesn’t – or not for very long. Or it’s accompanie­d by so many side effects that many people feel they would be better off if it didn’t work. And what works doesn’t work nearly as well as the press says it works. And – the cherry on the cake – we don’t know why it works. (Any piece of folk wisdom you may have picked up about “dopamine imbalances” or “serotonin levels” is almost certainly wrong.)

The opioid crisis in America is a public-health scandal that’s been waiting to happen since the early 1940s, when Arthur Sackler, among others, worked out how to couch drug advertisem­ents as clinical informatio­n. In its wake, the efficacy of countless drugs is being reassessed. Old trials are being picked over, old claims re-examined. The result? “GlaxoSmith­Kline has all but closed its psychiatri­c laboratori­es,” Scull explains, surveying the ruins left by this latest “paradigm shift” in psychiatry; “AstraZenec­a has essentiall­y dropped internal research on psychophar­macology, and Pfizer has dramatical­ly reduced its spending in the psychiatri­c arena.”

Were all their efforts quackery? Of course not. It is easy (and cheap) to cherry-pick horror stories from Scull’s impassione­d history. But his far more worrying point is that plenty of the effort expended over the last 200 years was intelligen­t, sincere and honestly conducted – and that, too, has brought only marginal and temporary relief to the suffering mind.

 ?? ?? The madness of crowds: Jack Nicholson (centre) in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
The madness of crowds: Jack Nicholson (centre) in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom