The Week

A massive blow to Us-saudi relations

-

Is this the end of the “special relationsh­ip” between America and Saudi Arabia? For more than 70 years, this valuable alliance has endured, despite repeated attempts by outsiders to sabotage it, said Abdulrahma­n Al-rashed in Asharq Al-awsat (London). But it now faces a “difficult test”. Last week Congress overrode Barack Obama’s veto of a bill that will allow the families of American victims of 9/11 to sue Saudi Arabia for alleged complicity in the attacks: it will enable courts to waive claims to foreign sovereign immunity in cases involving terrorist acts on US soil. The vote was a personal humiliatio­n for Obama, who has never had a law enacted over his veto. More importantl­y, however, it was a blow to the world order. The law will “damage the concept of the sovereignt­y of nations”, and undermine joint Us-saudi efforts to tackle terrorism.

A White House spokesman called the vote “the single most embarrassi­ng thing that the US Senate has done” in over 30 years, said Paul Mcleary in Foreign Policy – and you can see his point. As the CIA director John Brennan has noted, no country has more to lose from underminin­g the global legal norm of sovereign immunity than the US. If Congress proceeds with this bill in its current form, it will unleash a flurry of lawsuits against Saudi Arabia, and open up the US to similar legal assaults from other countries, said Andrew J. Bowen in Arab News (Jeddah). “At a time when populism is rife and stifling globalisat­ion”, this is the last thing the world needs.

We could conceivabl­y end up in a situation where British victims of the IRA started suing Washington for failing to stop Irish terrorists fundraisin­g in the US, said the FT. US legislator­s should think again before opening up this “Pandora’s box” of global lawsuits. Congress’s hardening anti-saudi sentiment is understand­able. While there may be “no hard evidence of official Saudi support” for 9/11, the kingdom has certainly played a “toxic” role in promoting radical Islam, and its current brutal bombing campaign in Yemen has attracted growing condemnati­on. But this bill risks being perceived as a form of US “judicial imperialis­m”: it is bound to invite retaliatio­n. There are “less self-defeating ways” to raise the heat on Saudi Arabia than by “outsourcin­g foreign policy to litigators”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom