Uxbridge Gazette

Council should challenge flights

-

WHILE Hillingdon Council justify the expenditur­e of £80,000 on legal fees to fight Heathrow expansion (Evening Standard, December 15) the council tells me it has neither the resources or in fact, the will, to challenge the Northolt Jet Company.

They choose to ignore the nearly 10,000 noisy, polluting low-flying jets already imposed on residents (9,910 commercial jets in 2015 – MOD statistics).

This Council’s failure to represent residents is, I believe, total .

It would be hard to find an incidence of local government failure of duty on this scale.

Whilst the majority of flight movements at Northolt are commercial the council choses to ignore the whole business on the grounds that it cannot challenge the aerodrome’s military jurisdicti­on.

In fact the council has many powers to do so.

When the number of jets was increased to 12,000 in 2012 the council failed to insist on consultati­on, they did not request an applicatio­n for planning permission or certificat­e of lawfulness.

At a time when the effects of pollution are well documented (WHO estimate that one in eight people will die prematurel­y from pollution) this council did not carry out an environmen­tal impact assessment.

The council continues to ignore major safety issues stating it is satisfied with the existing vague dialogue between the MOD and the CAA.

I believe that increases in air movements are imminent. Northolt Aerodrome has a capacity of 50,000 flight movements accommodat­ing 3.3 million passengers (see the MOD’s report entitled Project Ark in the public domain), a capacity which the MOD will be keen to achieve.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom