West Sussex County Times

Opposition to developmen­t

Overwhelmi­ngly negative response to latest consultati­on on housing planned between Horsham and Crawley

- Karen Dunn Local democracy reporter

Opposition is growing against proposals for thousands of new homes to be built on land between Horsham and Crawley at West of Ifield.

Crawley ‘doesn’t want to see another great addon’, according to one of its senior councillor­s as the government’s housing agency is proposing to build thousands of new homes between the town and Horsham.

Homes England recently held a consultati­on on its plans for 3,250 homes west of Ifield, with more than 70 people taking part in a series of online Q&A sessions.

These gave an update on the proposals for the first of three neighbourh­oods which would see 10,000 homes built over the next 30 years.

So far, the plans have proved unpopular in Crawley – and if Homes England hoped public opinion would be swayed, they were to be disappoint­ed.

The vast majority of views shared have been negative, with the occasional thumbsup from an isolated few.

The message has been clear, with the people who have taken an interest in this developmen­t – including Crawley Borough Council – do not want to see it built.

During a recent Crawley Question Time, Peter Smith, cabinet member for planning, said the main problem was the sheer scale of the proposals.

He added: “Crawley people have got very strong feelings about it.

“We don’t want to see another great add-on to our town, with all the infrastruc­ture that we need, especially when we’re struggling to provide jobs for our own people at the moment.

“We’ve got congestion, pollution, parking problems – we don’t need 10,000 homes on top of this.”

The site lies on Horsham land and could be one of the sites designated for developmen­t in the district’s new local plan.

Consultati­on on the draft plan is scheduled for June and July before it is submitted to the Secretary of State for examinatio­n in October.

It will take around a year to dot the ‘i’s and cross the ‘t’s before the new plan is adopted and published, probably in November 2022.

Once that has happened, the chances of fighting off any developmen­t would be vastly reduced – and Homes England aims to have a planning applicatio­n submitted before the Local Plan is sent for examinatio­n.

Mr Smith said: “Ever since we were made aware of this scheme, we’ve made it very clear that we would expect to be properly consulted and involved in it and that we expect that Crawley’s needs should be taken care of and listened to in this developmen­t.

“We’ve made clear our feelings on this and that we think that Crawley should have a say on these proposals even before it gets into the Horsham Local Plan.”

It was a view shared by Conservati­ve group leader Duncan Crow.

He said: “It’s right that Crawley Borough has as much say as possible over this because the impact will be felt in Crawley and the infrastruc­ture is going to be needed.

“The concern that I have is that the infrastruc­ture could be delayed from the housing. That’s something that we do see quite commonly over the years.

“Crawley definitely needs a seat at that table. Crawley’s voice needs to be heard.”

The pandemic has done little to change the views of opponents – especially given the damage it has caused to the local economy, Gatwick Airport and employment across the borough, which could take years to mend.

There have been suggestion­s that the whole thing should be put on the back burner.

Commenting on the plans on Homes England’s West of Ifield website, one person said: “This is now a different era from when these proposals were conceived. Time for a pause and reassessme­nt.”

Another added: “It will take years for Gatwick to recover and for us to see it back to how it was before the pandemic.

“Places are shut and people are on furlough at the airport so the need for 10,000 homes is not, at present, necessary.”

But Homes England engagement manager Tom Hustler said Covid would have a very short-term impact on the housing market and was confident that ‘one of the strongest economies in the UK’ would ‘bounce back fairly rapidly’.

He said: “People say ‘do we need these homes postCovid?’ The answer is yes – maybe not for the next six months but we won’t have planning [permission] in six months’ time.

“Maybe not for a year but we won’t have any houses built in a year.

“So by the time these houses are coming out of the ground and people are looking at show homes, the market will have come back quite significan­tly.”

Whether Mr Hustler’s confidence in the economy proves accurate or not, the list of reasons people are opposed to the developmen­t plans remains long.

To name a few, they include the loss of beautiful green space – and the impact that would have on wildlife, concerns about flooding, the lack of infrastruc­ture and the pressure so many new homes would place on Crawley services, the route of the proposed link road and whether or not affordable and social housing pledges will be met.

Ever since the plans for West of Ifield were first made public, Homes England has insisted that 50 per cent of the site will be retained as ‘accessible open space’ with new habitats for wildlife and a ten per cent increase in biodiversi­ty.

But these promises have not won over some objectors.

One commenter said: “You cannot cut down trees, destroy natural habitats , build thousands of houses and expect us to believe this is in some way an improvemen­t.”

Speaking about the proposed ‘enhancemen­t of Ifield Brook Meadows – providing a strong landscaped edge’, another said: “[The idea] sends shivers up my back as I dread to think what you will do to ruin it.”

On the issue of affordable and social housing, Mr Hustler said he understood why people were ‘cynical’ about it but insisted Homes England would comply with whatever Horsham’s Local Plan demanded.

He said: “As a government body, we always build out to whatever the local policy is.

“So we will build Horsham’s policy compliant social homes.

“It doesn’t make sense for one public body to get into an argument with another public body.”

While the feelings may be clear about the proposed developmen­t within Crawley, the next move will be down to Horsham District Council and whether the land will be one of the sites designated in its local plan when the latest draft is published.

Visit https://westofifie­ld. commonplac­e.is

Crawley should have its say before it gets into the Horsham Local Plan

PETER SMITH

Crawley’s cabinet member for planning

 ?? Photo by Steve Robards ?? Ifield Golf Club.
Photo by Steve Robards Ifield Golf Club.
 ??  ?? Ifield Golf Course
Ifield Golf Course

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom