Western Daily Press (Saturday)

Man jailed after dumping 100,000 tons of hazardous waste in quarry

- TRISTAN CORK tristan.cork@reachplc.com

AMAN who illegally dumped 100,000 tons of hazardous waste close to the main supply of drinking water for Bristol has been jailed.

And now a huge operation is under way to try to monitor the toxic dump he created to make sure it doesn’t leak into the streams that fill up the huge reservoir, just four miles south of Bristol.

The crime has already cost the authoritie­s millions in a clean-up operation, and a previous court hearing was told that if it does get into the reservoir, the bill could be as much as £9 billion.

Analysis of the ground showed that about half the samples were hazardous and either carcinogen­ic or ecotoxic, containing chopped/ shredded plastics, metals and foam.

It has now been described as one of the “most serious risks of harm in the country during the past 30 years” by shocked Environmen­t Agency bosses.

Mark Foley, who runs the company that operated the landfill waste dump, has been jailed for two years and three months at Bristol Crown Court.

Foley had a permit to fill Stowey Quarry, near Chew Valley reservoir, with what is classed as ‘clean’ or ‘non-hazardous’ waste – replacing the limestone that had been quarried from the ground for decades with soil and builders’ rubble after he took on the site in 2012.

But instead, Bristol Crown Court heard the firm he ran accepted a huge range of hazardous waste for years, mislabelli­ng it with dodgy record-keeping.

The court heard the offence Foley was eventually charged with happened within the first nine months of 2016, sparking an intensive investigat­ion by the Environmen­t Agency into the management of the site.

Foley was also jailed for a further 18 weeks, to be served concurrent­ly, for supplying false informatio­n to the Environmen­t Agency investigat­ors, and his firm ME Foley (Contractor­s) Ltd, failed to provide the court with any company accounts, and was itself fined £72,000.

The hazardous waste was covered over by soil, so the Environmen­t

Agency is still monitoring it and checking for any chemical leaks.

Investigat­ors still aren’t exactly sure what Foley’s firm allowed to be dumped there, and how long the illegal activity had been going on.

As well as secretly dumping hazardous waste when the quarry was only supposed to take ‘clean’ waste, Foley also accepted far more waste than his permit allowed.

“Stowey Quarry was only permitted to accept ‘clean’ and ‘non-hazardous’ material including soil and constructi­on waste for recovery purposes – to build bunds and embankment­s in the quarry,” said an Environmen­t Agency spokespers­on.

“Foley, as the site operator, was responsibl­e for checking waste arriving

at the site to ensure it was suitable. An investigat­ion showed the rules were routinely flouted,” he added.

Despite repeated warnings, the illegal tipping and waste disposal continued, and by October 2016, the Environmen­t Agency served a suspension notice that cancelled the permit and stopped the site from operating straight away.

Then workers at the Environmen­t Agency were able to access the site properly and work out what exactly had been dumped there.

“The Environmen­t Agency launched an investigat­ion to establish the potential risk to human health and the environmen­t from the illegal waste activities at the site. Samples taken from trial pits and bore holes revealed a high percentage of chopped/ shredded plastics, metals, foam and other man-made materials. Analysis showed that about half the samples were hazardous and either carcinogen­ic or ecotoxic,” he said.

Now, four and a half years on, monitoring of the huge site is still going on.

“The investigat­ion included the monitoring of landfill gases and sampling of nearby streams that showed an elevated concentrat­ion of gases together with leachate breaking out onto the surface of some surroundin­g fields,” said an Environmen­t Agency spokespers­on.

“Much of the waste arriving at Stowey Quarry was misleading­ly described as a ‘soil substitute’ in a deliberate attempt to circumvent the rules. The storage and disposal of hazardous material contravene­d the site’s permit that only allowed clean/ inert waste.

“Not only was the site dishonestl­y accepting the wrong type of waste, the operator was also lying about the amount being received. After checking waste transfer notes provided by the waste producers and hauliers, it is estimated that in 2016 alone, almost 95,000 tonnes of waste was deposited at Stowey Quarry – double

the 44,950 tonnes declared by M E Foley (Contractor­s) Ltd,” he added.

The detail of the charges put to Foley, from Cardiff, reveal what the Environmen­t Agency have found at the site. It states Foley’s firm allowed to be dumped ‘shredded fragmentis­er waste, automotive shredded residue, domestic waste, mixed waste fines and other waste including hazardous waste in a manner likely to cause pollution of the environmen­t or harm to human health’.

Back in October 2019, at an early court hearing into the case held before magistrate­s in Weston-superMare, Brendan Moorehouse, prosecutin­g for the Environmen­t Agency, said: “With the huge harm, the huge

Much of the waste arriving at Stowey Quarry was misleading­ly described as a ‘soil substitute’ in a deliberate attempt to circumvent the rules EA SPOKESPERS­ON

cost of clean up and the risk to public health, this is an extremely serious case. The minimum cost of clean up is in excess of £50 million, and should the contaminan­ts leach into the Bristol city water supply it could cost up to £9 billion,” he added.

After Foley was jailed, Rebecca Kirk of the Environmen­t Agency, said: “It has taken three years of meticulous work for our investigat­ion into Stowey Quarry to reach this stage. This was environmen­tal offending of the highest order

“I am pleased the judge acknowledg­ed the seriousnes­s of the offences committed and this is reflected in the sentences being handed down to those who orchestrat­e and take advantage of such criminal practice and show a blatant disregard to the environmen­t and public health,” she added.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? > Stowey Quarry was used to dispose of plastic, metal, foam and other materials. The crime has now been described as one of the ‘most serious risks of harm in the country during the past 30 years’
> Stowey Quarry was used to dispose of plastic, metal, foam and other materials. The crime has now been described as one of the ‘most serious risks of harm in the country during the past 30 years’
 ?? Pictures: Environmen­t Agency ?? > Soil was used to hide the illegal deposits in the quarry
Pictures: Environmen­t Agency > Soil was used to hide the illegal deposits in the quarry

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom