Western Mail

Union chief in warning to Labour over anti-Semitic payments

- PATRICK DALY Press Associatio­n reporter newsdesk@walesonlin­e.co.uk

THE chief of Labour’s biggest union backer said his organisati­on would “no doubt” review its financial support in the wake of the decision to offer payouts to whistleblo­wers who accused the party of failing to tackle anti-Semitism.

General secretary of Unite, Len McCluskey, used an interview with the Observer to issue a warning to Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer after the party agreed to pay “substantia­l damages” to whistleblo­wers who contribute­d to a TV expose of its handling of anti-Semitism.

Mr McCluskey, an ally of former leader Jeremy Corbyn, said the payouts were “an abuse of members’ money”.

He told the paper: “A lot of it is Unite’s money and I’m already being asked all kinds of questions by my executive.

“It’s as though a huge sign has been put up outside the Labour party with ‘queue here with your writ and get your payment over there’.”

Under Mr Corbyn’s leadership, the party was dogged with allegation­s that it had failed to take action over members accused of promoting antiSemiti­sm.

Seven former employees from the party’s governance and legal unit, who were responsibl­e for the investigat­ion of allegation­s of misconduct by party members, sued Labour after it issued a press release describing them as having “personal and political axes to grind”.

The legal action followed the broadcast in July 2019 of a BBC Panorama programme titled Is Labour Anti-Semitic?. The party has refused to disclose how much the settlement would end up costing, but the Telegraph reported that fees and damages were likely to amount to nearly £375,000.

Sir Keir’s predecesso­r Mr Corbyn called the decision to settle “disappoint­ing” and claimed it was a “political decision, not a legal one”.

Mr Corybn said his team was advised while he was leader that the “party had a strong defence”.

Panorama reporter John Ware is taking legal action against the Islington North MP following the remarks.

Labour declined to comment on Mr McCluskey’s donation review threat, but Sir Keir’s spokesman previously said all three candidates in the final of the party’s leadership contest, which concluded in April, had agreed they wanted to see the case settled.

The spokesman told reporters last month: “I think it is worth rememberin­g that during the leadership contest, all three candidates – Rebecca (Long-Bailey), Keir and Lisa (Nandy) – said, and all pledged at the Jewish Labour Movement hustings, that they would seek to settle this issue and that also they believed the party had not taken the right approach at the time.”

In his interview, Mr McCluskey also warned Sir Keir over the direction of the party, suggesting it would “constitute a problem” if the former director of public prosecutio­ns moved away from his leadership campaign pledges.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom