‘New court case proves jail mum is Iran’s pawn’
NEW charges against Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe are further evidence she is being held for “political leverage” amid a multimillion-pound dispute between Britain and Iran, her husband has said.
Richard Ratcliffe has appealed to UK officials to insist on attending her second trial when it begins in Tehran on Sunday, and said the situation had left his family “caught” between two governments “fighting”.
The 42-year-old mother-of-one has been detained in Iran since 2016, when she was sentenced to five years in prison over allegations, which she denies, of plotting to overthrow the Iranian government.
Having been moved to house arrest in March, when thousands of prisoners were granted clemency and released from Iranian jails amid the Covid-19 outbreak, Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe was returned to court on Tuesday only months from her expected release date and told she would face a second trial.
Boris Johnson is urging Iran not to return Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe to prison, saying the decision to bring new charges is “indefensible and unacceptable”, according to Downing Street.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “Iran’s decision to bring new charges against Nazanin is indefensible and unacceptable.
“We’ve been consistently clear that she must not be returned to prison, to do so would be unjust and inhumane.
“We are continuing to support Nazanin and her family at this very distressing time.
“We are seeking to be allowed to attend the hearing that does take place, and we’re raising our concern about Nazanin’s case with the Iranian government at the highest levels.”
Mr Ratcliffe said the trial would hear charges of spreading anti-government propaganda, in a case officials dropped in December 2017, after a visit from the then-foreign secretary Boris Johnson, but reopened in May 2018.
He said: “We’ve always been treated in a strange, odd way and marked out as exceptional.
“This second court case is doing that again, and it’s signalling again she’s being held for political leverage to push the British Government to do something.
“That’s a tricky position for us to be in, it’s a tricky position for the British Government to be in.”
It has been claimed Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe is being held in order to force the UK into settling a multimillion-pound dispute with Iran.
The debt dates back to the 1970s when the then-Shah of Iran paid the UK £400m for 1,500 Chieftain tanks.
After he was toppled in 1979, Britain refused to deliver the tanks to the new Islamic Republic and kept the money, despite British courts accepting it should be repaid.
Mr Ratcliffe added: “I’ve always felt the [UK] government is reluctant to be honest with us, reluctant to call us in hostage, reluctant to acknowledge some of the abuses she’s gone through, and reluctant to really call out Iran for its practices.
“I don’t think that’s got us very far. In a situation like this, the more you escalate it, the risk there is of things happening.
“So it’s not as if just shouting at Iran is suddenly going to change things, but certainly being a lot more honest, a lot more straightforward, is much more likely to protect people.”
Describing how his wife “woke up terrified” on Tuesday when Iranian guards came to take her to court, Mr Ratcliffe said: “The guys in the Jeep came along, Revolutionary Guards, they’re the guys that kept her and interrogated her.
“So she was fearing the worst, that she was being taken back to prison and had to be reassured, really, that it was actually court she was going to.
“Oddly she came back from court more relieved that she had gone in that, ‘OK, at least I’m back home and it’s only a court case’.”
Her plight has been the focus of a long campaign to release her, spearheaded by organisations such as Amnesty International, and family members, including her Cardiffbased sister-in-law, Rebecca Jones, who is a GP.
Redress, a torture survivors group working to free Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe, has urged the government to react “firmly and quickly”.
Leanna Burnard, the group’s legal officer, said: “The UK Government must assert Nazanin’s rights under international law, given its decision to exercise diplomatic protection in her case.
“It must insist on urgently visiting Nazanin and seeking consular access to attend Nazanin’s second trial, to demonstrate to Iran that it is ready to protect the legal rights of its nationals.”