Western Mail

Hydrogen the future as Wales focuses on eco travel

- PROFESSOR STUART COLE Professor Stuart Cole CBE is Emeritus Professor of Transport (Economics and Policy), University of South Wales

LAST week I had the good fortune to travel along the beautiful coastal road from Aberystwyt­h to Aberteifi, Cardigan, in a brand-new hydrogenpo­wered bus indicative of how seriously we have to take the impact of climate change on our lives.

It gave a very comfortabl­e ride; operationa­lly the vehicle performed well on a road not devoid of steep hills and easily made the 80-mile round trip on its fuel load.

Simply put, hydrogen bus technology involves liquid hydrogen stored in roof-top tanks mixing with ‘clean’ oxygen from the air and processed to create electricit­y, which powers the batteries linked to the motor powering the vehicle’s operation.

Water is the only emission.

To be affordable for commercial operations (rather than government-funded experiment­s) the current price of such vehicles has to fall from £500,000 to nearer £150,000, the current price of a Euro 6, very low-emission bus. Larger-scale production might achieve this.

Additional­ly, it requires refuelling currently every 240 miles which, according to the manufactur­ers, takes six to eight minutes.

Consequent­ly, there is a need for hydrogen stations, as with battery recharging points for electric buses, along with skilled mechanics to carry out maintenanc­e. And operating costs per mile have to be comparable with existing vehicles.

This commercial­ly led developmen­t has reflected a revolution­ary change in the Welsh Government’s approach to transport governance. The post-Senedd election cabinet reshuffle put transport in the climate change department.

This contrasts transport with planning (under Sue Essex) and with the economy (and jobs) from Ieuan Wyn Jones to Ken Skates.

Lee Waters continues as deputy minister for transport and one can be assured that his environmen­tal concerns will continue – with added lengths of 50mph maximum-speed motorways and in urban areas a reduction from 30mph to 20mph speed limit to (on limited evidence) improve air quality.

Labour manifesto climate change promises are possible, and mostly desirable, but could be restricted by funding levels and the Senedd’s legislativ­e powers.

The plan to reduce car usage through a high-quality, sustainabl­e and affordable public transport network and new service integratio­n powers for Transport for Wales (which this column has supported) has evolved in part through the high investment in Valley Lines (Cardiff Metro) electrific­ation and for new trains all over Wales (except the Heart of Wales Line) worth £1.5bn.

Price, reliabilit­y and predictabl­e journey time comparison are key factors in modal transfer from the car with consequent climate change impacts.

An accepted means of reducing carbon emissions on a large scale is through funding active travel (cycling and walking) routes and safer links to railway stations and high-usage bus stops.

This is an expensive investment; putting white lines to show cycle lanes is insufficie­nt. Separate road space for pedestrian­s, cyclists and buses – excluding cars, vans and trucks – is epitomised in Denmark and the Netherland­s.

Consequent­ly, strengthen­ing the promotion of walking and cycling or ‘developing active travel integrated network maps and the 10-year Wales infrastruc­ture investment plan for a zero-carbon economy’ has to be considerab­ly more than manifesto rhetoric.

These are important, but expensive developmen­ts for future generation­s’ air quality and health. This column will be watching!

Wales has two government­s providing different aspects of the public sectors’ transport responsibi­lities, which hampers our Welsh Government achievemen­t of some objectives, particular­ly when these seem at odds with each other.

Westminste­r doggedly retains bus regulatory powers.

The proposed Bus Bill soon to be before the Senedd, if not watered down as in the previous bill, should achieve the desired franchised integratio­n of all public transport.

The long-delayed Williams railway report was expected to recommend transfer of rail infrastruc­ture responsibi­lity to Transport for Wales.

Instead, it metamorpho­sed into the Grant Shapps transport White Paper setting out the UK Government’s policy on the Great British Railways single rail operator rather than a transport profession­al’s conclusion­s, which are two quite different publicatio­ns.

The White Paper retains existing railway powers for Wales and Scotland, resulting in Wales continuing to be devoid of responsibi­lity for rail infrastruc­ture, and its new trains would continue to operate on a system largely determined by Westminste­r funding.

This despite the Silk Commission devolved powers recommenda­tions, on whose transport panel I had the honour to serve.

Full-price tickets will continue; however, achieving Welsh Government’s affordable train travel requires lower-priced off-peak and advance-purchase tickets availabili­ty on all services.

These plans will involve considerab­le transport capital investment and continuous maintenanc­e funded from two sources – government expenditur­e, or the user through fares or road charges.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? > Cycle lanes like this in Cardiff are expensive but crucial to the Welsh Government’s active travel vision
> Cycle lanes like this in Cardiff are expensive but crucial to the Welsh Government’s active travel vision

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom