Western Mail

Workplace bullying can damage business DYLAN JONES-EVANS

-

THERE is growing evidence that despite many organisati­ons claiming to have more employee focused policies, bullying is on the rise within the workplace.

For example, a recent study found that 75% of employees had reported that they had either been a target of, or have witnessed, bullying at work. Another survey of 2,000 UK based employees on their experience­s at work to date found that 23% of the British workforce has been bullied at work, 25% have been made to feel left out by colleagues, and 12% admitted to struggling to make friends where they worked.

In my own sector, an investigat­ion by the Guardian revealed hundreds of complaints against senior university staff with dozens of academics reporting aggressive behaviour, extreme pressure to deliver results, career sabotage and human resource managers appearing more concerned about avoiding negative publicity than protecting staff.

As well as being defined by persistent offensive, intimidati­ng, humiliatin­g behaviour, workplace bullying can take many forms including regularly underminin­g someone, unfair treatment or denying someone’s training or promotion opportunit­ies.

As a result, this now increasing­ly involves the abuse of authority by senior managers, reflecting an autocratic style by some that is increasing­ly in conflict with the work practices of some of the best organisati­ons in the World.

For example, an article in the Harvard Business Review noted that a more collegiate style of management – where there is honest and open dialogue on the challenges faced by employees – should be encouraged.

Perhaps the biggest problem is that while there may be formal policies and procedures to deal with bullying, senior managers often feel it doesn’t apply to them because there is a stereotype approach as to what bullying constitute­s. This is despite the fact that it can take many different forms and is not necessaril­y a case of one size fits all.

The problem has been further complicate­d in recent years by the emergence of social networking, which means that bullying is moving from the office onto the internet with serious consequenc­es for organisati­onal policies to deal with this abuse. Unfortunat­ely, there seems to be little realisatio­n by those with strategic responsibi­lity for organisati­ons, such as a board of directors or trustees, that the main consequenc­e of a bullying culture an inevitable decrease in productivi­ty and a direct impact on the bottom-line of the business. More worryingly for the future of the organisati­on, good employees will eventually resign and leave while those undertakin­g the bullying remain. This will start the process again as those managers who are the perpetrato­rs of bullying are often motivated by their own personal issues such as lack of selfconfid­ence and envy towards other people’s abilities, success and popularity.

If nothing is done to address this problem, then it will have a direct effect on the performanc­e of the organisati­on, negatively affecting its culture and productivi­ty and may, in extreme instances, affect its reputation, especially if legal action is taken.

The problem is that when such bullying becomes institutio­nalised and results in situation where staff are constantly overloaded, where there is a blame culture among colleagues, and where aggressive behaviour is tolerated, there will be serious consequenc­es for the future of that organisati­on. In many instances, such a culture begins with the senior manager and paranoia sets in among others within the organisati­on if they do not act the same.

And there are an increasing number of research studies, which show that rather than increasing performanc­e, overloaded and bullied employees tend to work for organisati­ons where the management style is bureaucrat­ic and reactive, and, inevitably, its overall performanc­e is in decline.

Not surprising­ly, such behaviour hits the bottom line of the business with a recent survey by the Health & Safety Executive estimated that 17.9 million working days a year are lost to stress, anxiety and depression at a cost of billions of pounds to UK industry annually.

In contrast, those workers who go the extra mile for their employer, who feel recognised and supported, and who look forward to going to their place of work every day, are those employed for dynamic forward-thinking organisati­ons where the management style is empowering and successful.

With the ‘great resignatio­n’ phenomenon still affecting many organisati­ons after the pandemic, perhaps the simple message for all organisati­ons, is that its employees are its biggest assets, something that some still fail to grasp even in the 21st Century.

However, if these assets are affected by issues such as workplace bullying, the result could be lower performanc­e, reduced profits, de-motivated employees and, where court cases take place, reputation­al costs for both the organisati­on and the managers involved.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom