Western Morning News (Saturday)

Scientific facts cannot be denied

-

IN his recent column (February 10th) Anton Coaker argues that methane emissions from livestock are not ‘comparable’ to methane emitted from the fossil fuel industry. This is certainly true, because the amount of methane originatin­g from fossil fuel production and use, which is calculated in the global carbon budget (https:// www.globalcarb­onproject.org/ carbonbudg­et/) as between

111 and 128 TgCH4/year, is only approximat­ely half of that originatin­g from agricultur­e and waste at 206-217 TgCH4/year.

Since the industrial revolution, methane concentrat­ions in the atmosphere have increased by ca. 2.5 times due exclusivel­y to human activities of which agricultur­e and waste has made, and continues to make, the largest contributi­on. In fact, domesticat­ed ruminants are the largest source of anthropoge­nic methane, contributi­ng an estimated 28% of annual global production.

In the UK, government statistics for 2019 (https://www.gov.uk/ government/statistics/agriclimat­e-report-2021/agri-climaterep­ort-2021) reveal agricultur­e accounts for 47% of all CH4 emissions and of this 84% originates from enteric fermentati­on in livestock.

The argument that emissions of methane from cows is somehow ‘natural’ and involved in a ‘shortterm’ cycle which is not adding to global warming is frankly scientific­ally bogus.

Molecules of CH4 emitted from cows, from fossil fuel use or from any other source survive in the atmosphere for approximat­ely nine years and have the same warming potential on the earth’s atmosphere.

CH4 is the second most important non-condensing greenhouse gas affecting the Earth’s climate, and the contributi­on of domesticat­ed ruminants to CH4 emissions is highly significan­t.

Unfortunat­ely, these facts based on scientific study cannot be gainsaid, however much Anton Coaker wishes they were not true. Professor Bruce Webb

Exeter, Devon

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom