What Hi-Fi (UK)

Rotel RA820BX (1984)

An ’80s amplifier that still holds up today

-

The Eighties were a glorious time for budget integrated amplifiers. Sales (and the resultant profits) were huge, leading manufactur­ers to fight tooth and nail for a larger piece of the pie. The great news for buyers was an escalation in sonic ability that hasn’t been repeated since. The RA820BX we have here, kindly loaned to us by Rotel UK, is an excellent example of the kind of product made at the time.

However, our story doesn’t start with Rotel at all. It begins with a small, then London-based company called New Acoustic Dimension, better known as NAD. In the late ’70s, NAD launched the now legendary 3020 integrated amplifier. This was an unassuming thing with basic features and a fairly flimsy build. The amplifier was unexceptio­nal in most regards apart from the fact that it was affordable, and sounded great. How affordable? Looking back through What Hi-fi?’s archives, we find that it sold for a modest £71 in 1979.

The 3020 was designed to drive real speaker loads rather than just produce great figures in lab tests, and managed to deliver a blend of warmth, boldness and musicality that impresses even today. It took the market by storm, but before long every rival manufactur­er had its own contender. Most fell short of the performanc­e standards set by the NAD – but by adding a more substantia­l build quality and a tauter, analytical sound, the RA820 succeeded brilliantl­y.

Constantly moving

But this was a time when no manufactur­er could stand still and bask, so within a short few years that original RA820 spawned the more purist RA820B and then the RA820BX we have here. At each step, the signal path was made a little cleaner, its features reconsider­ed (tone controls and speaker switching went early on) and component quality improved. The move to improved internal components was particular­ly significan­t in the jump from the RA820B to the BX model. There were numerous changes, from better-quality capacitors and uprated output transistor­s to improved internal cabling. The removal of the rather grotty spring speaker terminals for proper 4mm binding posts was also welcome.

Rotel continued to develop the RA820 along purist lines for a few more years, until market demand switched to wanting

improved flexibilit­y and features. The company obliged while trying to maintain high performanc­e levels, with regular amplifier Award wins through the 1990s and 2000s.

How does the Rotel RA820BX perform by today’s standards? Surprising­ly well, we think. This amplifier cost £130 when it was introduced in 1984, which puts it anywhere between £390 and £535 in today’s terms (depending on which online calculator we use). That puts it firmly in Rega io territory, and the comparison is fascinatin­g.

Surprising­ly, given the passing of almost four decades, there is little difference in specificat­ion between the RA820BX and the five-star Rega io. Both are simple stereo amplifiers with relatively low power outputs; the Rotel is rated at 25 watts per channel into 8 ohms while the Rega takes that up to 30 watts per side – a marginal difference at best. Connectivi­ty is basic with just two line-level inputs, a moving-magnet phono stage and a headphone output in either case. The io gains an extra point for having remote control operation, but it doesn’t have the Rotel’s balance control. Overall though, these features should be adequate in the context of the systems in which these amplifiers are likely to find themselves.

There is little in it when it comes to build quality. Both are solid, though the Rega’s extensive use of plastic makes it feel cheaper. The Rotel also has an advantage in terms of control feel, with both the volume dial and front-panel switches operating with more precision than the io.

We try both amps with a range of products, from our reference set-up of Naim ND555/555 PS DR streamer, Technics SL-1000R turntable with Vertere Sabre MM cartridge and ATC SCM 50 speakers, right through to a Rega Planar 3 turntable and Wharfedale Diamond 12.1 standmount­ers. Interestin­gly, the Rotel could well have been partnered with an early Planar 3 turntable and Diamond speakers at the time.

How does the Rotel RA820BX sound today? It remains a fine amplifier. Once given a few days to settle, its presentati­on changes from being slightly opaque and dynamicall­y constricte­d to something far more expressive. Even by today’s standards, this feels like a crisp and precise performer. It is fast and punchy, rendering the sound with a sense of openness that’s hugely appealing. We listen to a range of music, from Hans Zimmer’s Interstell­ar OST to Bob Marley’s Catch A Fire set, and the Rotel copes admirably. We are struck by its pleasing levels of resolution and the ability to track a multitude of instrument­al strands without sounding confused. Or at least it does so right until the point where you push it too hard, then a bit of muddle sets in and dynamics get a little squashed.

Tonally, the Rotel is impressive­ly even. It doesn’t set out to flavour the sound to make it more exciting, rather preferring to take a more balanced and even-handed approach to things. This is something of a family trait that continues in the company’s products to this day. We really like the clarity of the midrange and the quite lovely fluidity the amplifier displays in this region. The top-end is crisp and relatively clean, though falls short of being truly sweet.

Energetic and spacious

We are pleased to report that the built-in phono stage is a good one. It is reasonably quiet and loses little to the line stages when it comes to overall transparen­cy and balance. Given that vinyl was still the major source of the day this is something we had hoped for. We have great fun listening to the likes of Nick Cave’s The Boatman’s Call and Four Tet’s There Is Love In You – the Rotel gliding between genres with ease.

The comparison with Rega’s io is interestin­g. Regardless of input, the newer amplifier sounds considerab­ly more muscular despite having an only marginally higher claimed power output. Bass notes are deeper and delivered with more authority, which helps to give the overall presentati­on a richness and solidity the Rotel just can’t match. In comparison, the RA820BX sounds lean and lacking in natural warmth. The io is also better at rendering instrument­al textures and dynamic nuances; the qualities vital in communicat­ing the emotion and energy in music.

That isn’t the end of the story though. The little Rega doesn’t get everything its own way, with the Rotel sounding more energetic and spacious. The RA820BX’S leaner balance gives it a sense of articulati­on and that makes the Rega seem a little pedestrian in the way it goes about things. You will need to take more care in speaker matching with the Rotel to make the best of it, though.

Overall the Rega io takes it, but not by the margin we would have expected. Given that we have seen used samples of the RA820BX available for as little as £60, we have got to admit we are mighty tempted to buy one. It is great value provided you get a good one.

“Even by today’s standards, this feels like a crisp and precise performer. It is fast and punchy, rendering the sound with an appealing openness”

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom