Who Do You Think You Are?

Bastardy bonds

Laura Berry looks at an under-used source for revealing the paternity of children born to unmarried parents

-

Fathers who refused to sign a bond could be issued with a bastardy order by the justice of the peace

The paternity of an ancestor born out of wedlock is usually difficult to prove, frustratin­gly leaving a whole branch of your family tree void of names. All too often there’s a blank space where the father’s name should be on the child’s birth and baptism certificat­es and on their marriage certificat­e later in life, and the baby usually took the mother’s surname at birth. Finding a bastardy bond then could be like hitting the jackpot.

The Bastardy Act of 1575/6 granted special powers to churchward­ens, overseers of the poor and justices of the peace ( JP) in England and Wales to question single mothers who might be in need of financial support, in order to ascertain the father’s identity and bring him to account. These bastardy examinatio­ns sometimes survive in local record offices.

Financial burdens

The aim of the legislatio­n was to prevent the mother and her child becoming a financial burden on the parish coffers, and pressure was subsequent­ly exerted on the father to sign a bastardy bond agreeing to pay for the child’s maintenanc­e and indemnifyi­ng the parish against any future costs until the child was at least old enough to be apprentice­d. Records of payments might be found in the account books of the overseer of the poor or the churchward­en. Fathers who refused to sign a bond could be issued with a bastardy order by the justice of the peace ( JP), obliging them to sign the bond or face prison.

In 1732/3 it became a legal requiremen­t for pregnant single women to present themselves to the authoritie­s before the child’s birth and notify them of the father’s identity. However, in practice many examinatio­ns continued to take place after the child’s birth, in which case the child’s sex may be stated, though it’s rare that the child’s name was given particular­ly before the 19th century.

Women were compelled to disclose as much informatio­n as they could to help the parish identify the father. In January 1790, 37-year-old Elizabeth Norther appeared before a JP in St Clement Danes and her examinatio­n statement discloses an extraordin­ary amount of detail. She revealed that she married John Norther about 14 years ago in South Kirby, Yorkshire, but before their marriage he worked as a servant for Edward Dickens of Lincoln’s Inn and slept over his employer’s stables in Portugal Street, St Clement Danes. However, her husband had died nine years ago. She was now pregnant with a child that was likely to become chargeable to the parish of St Clement Danes, and “one Christophe­r who lives as servant with a Mr Jones in Half Moon Street, whose surname she does not know, is the father, he having had carnal knowledge of this

 ??  ?? An expectant mother appears before a justice of the peace to name her child’s father
An expectant mother appears before a justice of the peace to name her child’s father

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom