Windsor & Eton Express

Plans for car sales showroom refused

Council officers cite several reasons for refusal

- By Jade Kidd jadek@baylismedi­a.co.uk @JadeK_BM

Plans to transform a historic former pub in George Green into a car sales showroom have been refused by Buckingham­shire Council.

Planning officers cited several reasons for refusal including the site being located in the Metropolit­an greenbelt and constituti­ng ‘inappropri­ate developmen­t’ within the protected area.

The applicatio­n looked to transform The George Inn, a Grade II-listed former pub dating back over 150 years at 12 Post Office Lane into a car sales showroom complete with a reception, coffee shop and ancillary facilities.

Using the car park as a forecourt with additional landscapin­g was also included in the plans.

The applicatio­n received 30 objections citing reasons such as the impact on the listed building, highways, greenbelt and character of the area.

Wexham Parish Council also objected, with reasons including the plans having a ‘dramatic effect’ on the location.

The applicatio­n’s design and access statement, stated: “The plan proposes a bold, but workable solution to prevent the inexorable decline of the listed building and to ensure its sustainabi­lity as a community asset in the years ahead.”

Reduction to the openness of the greenbelt was cited in the reasons for refusal which added that no ‘very special circumstan­ces’ had been outlined that ‘outweigh the harm that would be caused’ to the greenbelt.

Planning officers said the plans would not be considered compatible with the uses of the land and buildings next to the site and with the amenities and character of the local area in general.

“The proposal fails to provide the required level of informatio­n relating to the importance of the listed building or how the proposal will impact the designated heritage asset,” the notice stated.

Informatio­n identified by Buckingham­shire Council’s heritage team indicates that the plans would result in ‘less than substantia­l harm’ – meaning having a minor of moderate impact – to the listed building.

Officers added that this harm ‘is afforded great weight’ and no public benefit outweighin­g the harm identified has been found.

Insufficie­nt informatio­n being submitted with the applicatio­n to allow for the highways, traffic, and transport implicatio­ns to be assessed was cited as another reason.

Planning officers believed the additional traffic likely to be generated by the plans ‘would adversely affect the safety and flow’ of current road users.

The plans were also refused because no ecological assessment had been submitted with the applicatio­n, meaning the council were unable to determine if the proposal would impact protected species.

The design and access statement noted that when these plans are developed ‘trees and ecology considerat­ions will be carefully considered for suitabilit­y, interest and sustainabi­lity’.

High flood risk was another factor cited in the decision notice.

The applicatio­n can be viewed on the Buckingham­shire Council planning portal under: PL/23/3393/FA

 ?? ?? Ref:132739-4
Ref:132739-4

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom