Wokingham Today

Going Experiment­al

- TONY JOHNSON caveat.lector@icloud.com

IF you’re ‘on-trend’ with your words, you’ll know that the 90’s phrase “going postal” means a sudden outburst of anger, typically at work. If you’re not, you can easily find its definition. (the ‘Hint-ernet’).

Here in Wokingham we’re a bit more

‘refained’ but some of us are thinking of going experiment­al - possibly in reaction to those who already have.

Consulting nicely

We do - at least at a national level. In the last year the Government launched or reported on 1,274 consultati­ons - just over five a day.

And when the results get published everyone can see what impact the responses have had

- if any. Sometimes it feels a bit like mouse vs juggernaut, but sometimes things change.

Locally, we have far more consultati­ons that you’d imagine. In addition to WBC’s seven current consultati­ons and 20 finished ones in the last year, there’s been a further 17 - more of these in a moment.

Currently, WBC’s consulting us on the “Local Plan Update: Homes for the Future”, asking us where the developmen­ts should happen in the borough. There’s also the “Statement of Community Involvemen­t” asking us how we’d like to be engaged with the local developmen­t process.

Don’t ask, just tell?

Those other 17 consultati­ons come in the form of Traffic Regulation Orders (TRO’s).

Which sounds a bit odd, particular­ly if you don’t like being given orders (especially not from WBC), but contrary to the title, each TRO is required by law to have a period of consultati­on. Yes, consultati­on.

Except that four of the 17 TRO’s are Experiment­al TRO’s and here the law’s different – there’s no consultati­on required and we aren’t being asked – we’re being told.

Could there be another way?

Between a rock …

Last week’s commentary alluded to a meeting of Wokingham Town’s full council, at which a brief but interestin­g update on Regenerati­on was being given.

However, it became apparent that there was some concern being expressed over the Borough Council having dropped “an Experiment­al” into the heavily overspent Market Place project.

The minutes of the Town’s Planning and Transport (P&T) committee showed they hadn’t taken kindly to the Experiment­al TRO on parking restrictio­ns. On behalf of residents they’d recorded their concerns and made proposals for improvemen­t.

This might feel a bit surreal - Wokingham Town Council taking objection to a Wokingham Borough Council department’s decision, but it’s no different from a Parish Council expressing an objection on a local matter, particular­ly where they haven’t been consulted in advance.

Listening to the Town’s Q&A, it was made crystal clear to Town Councillor­s that ‘you have as much opportunit­y to influence the process as you ever had’ and after a further question that ‘’the officers will look at what you say and judge it accordingl­y based upon the current situation in the town and what they believe is right’. The vote that followed saw the P&T proposals accepted unanimousl­y.

… And a hard place

Having gained the town’s Full Council approval to call the Borough to account for parking in Wokingham’s town centre is one thing, over in Spencers Wood things aren’t as clear cut.

In a network of country lanes, Croft Road is so narrow that it was made one way some years ago. As it’s smack bang in the middle one of the borough’s four strategic developmen­t locations, the existing properties on Croft Road now have new houses to the front, side and back of them. Totally surrounded.

As part of the deal for the developmen­t, a new access road was approved and now cuts across Croft Road.

On or around October 12, it was a shock for residents to discover two huge concrete blocks either side of the new access road - completely blocking Croft Road for through traffic.

On November 11 an Experiment­al TRO was published on WBC’s website, declaring that traffic was being restricted. Almost four weeks after the road had been blocked.

So all vehicles now go to the road block then have to reverse on the narrow unlit road, often trying to turn round in a private driveway. Imagine one of the Borough’s refuse collection trucks or other large HGV trying this tricky manoeuvre and you can guess what’ll happen next …

A call for action

Nobody’s claiming WBC’s consultati­on process is perfect, but many of us seem to prefer being non-participan­ts - then complainin­g after the event. But whichever side you take, there are tricky issues to consider.

Should we eliminate parking entirely from the regenerate­d town centre in order to keep it looking tidy? Or should we actively encourage afternoon and evening trade by allowing some parking ?

Should we prioritise new roads and new residents at the expense of existing ones by blocking old roads and failing to make adequate provision for turning ?

Or should we stay wedded to the old road network and do nothing ?

As these two topics were known about in advance, perhaps it’s time for our borough politician­s to arrange a more judicious use of Experiment­al Traffic orders – before anyone gets the wrong impression as to what they’re about?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom