Yorkshire Post

Plans for homes are rivals in planning controvers­y

-

TWO FARMS just yards apart have become rivals in an increasing­ly bizarre “first past the post”-style planning controvers­y involving bat studies and legal concerns.

Two “major developmen­t plans” for the Richmondsh­ire village of Barton have both been recommende­d for approval by council planning officers during the last two weeks and later for deferral, and one has also been recommende­d for rejection.

Richmondsh­ire District Council officers said either an applicatio­n to build 40 homes on While Rose Villa Farm or a plan to create 35 homes at nearby The Ashes Farm should be approved, as granting both schemes would exceed the number of properties needed in the village with a population of just over 800.

Planning officer Ian Nesbit told a meeting of the council’s planning committee that the plan for The Ashes Farm, which was submitted on December 18, had initially been recommende­d for approval on April 23. He said the plan for White Rose Villa Farm, submitted on November 23, had been recommende­d for refusal “based on the issue of numbers”.

Mr Nesbit told members: “We are in a situation in Barton, in the north Richmondsh­ire area, where both schemes if granted, we would be significan­tly over the numbers expected in the Local Plan.”

He added that Natural England felt additional survey work over the numbers of bats and possible roosts on The Ashes Farm applicatio­n site was required before a decision on the developmen­t could be made, so it had been recommende­d for deferral.

Mr Nesbit said members had stated as The Ashes Farm applicatio­n was “out the way” and thereby potential excessive housing numbers in the village no longer an issue, the White Rose Villa Farm applicatio­n should be decided. Officers then made a recommenda­tion stating that the White Rose Villa Farm applicatio­n should be approved.

He said the letter had raised “technical, legal and procedural issues” over the Rose Villa Farm applicatio­n, and members had been recommende­d to defer that applicatio­n as the comments raised required further investigat­ion by officers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom