Yorkshire Post

Former police boss will not be charged over perjury allegation­s

- CHRIS BURN NEWS CORRESPOND­ENT ■ Email: chris.burn@jpress.co.uk ■ Twitter: @chrisburn_post

FORMER SOUTH Yorkshire Police and Crime Commission­er Shaun Wright will face no further action after a 14-month investigat­ion found “insufficie­nt evidence” to support allegation­s he had committed perjury when discussing the Rotherham child sexual exploitati­on scandal with MPs.

A 26-page report published by the Independen­t Office for Police Conduct yesterday revealed Mr Wright refused to answer questions while being interviewe­d about the allegation­s under criminal caution in April this year after reading a prepared statement in which he denied lying under oath to MPs.

“He then exercised his right not to answer any further questions during his interview,” the report said.

The IOPC said it would not making a referral to the Director of Public Prosecutio­ns after the watchdog investigat­ed complaints from two people that Mr Wright had committed perjury when giving evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee on September 9, 2014.

The hearing took place when he was still police and crime commission­er but was facing widespread calls to resign in the wake of the publicatio­n of a damning inquiry which had revealed at least 1,400 children in Rotherham had been sexually exploited between 1997 and 2013.

Mr Wright gave evidence under oath regarding his knowledge of allegation­s of widespread child sexual abuse in Rotherham during his time as cabinet member for children’s services at Rotherham Council, between 2005 and 2010.

The IOPC investigat­ion considered four areas – whether Mr Wright had lied when he stated he did not receive reports detailing the extent of CSE in Rotherham; whether he had lied when stating he did not recall speaking to any abuse survivors at a barbecue organised by council youth service Risky Business; whether he lied by stating he had not taken legal advice for the answers he was giving to MPs and whether he lied by stating he was not aware of the extent of CSE in Rotherham when he was a council cabinet member.

The IOPC said: “On the basis of the investigat­ion report there is insufficie­nt evidence to indicate that Mr Wright either knew his statement to be false or did not believe it to be true.”

Mr Wright resigned as police commission­er a week after the select committee hearing following repeated calls to step down.

South Yorkshire Police and Crime Panel, which holds the local police and crime commission­er to account, received complaints against Mr Wright in 2015 and referred them to the police watchdog, then known as the IPCC.

The watchdog initially refused to investigat­e the complaints and referred them to the Home Affairs Select Committee but subsequent­ly reconsider­ed and opened an investigat­ion, which began in June 2017 and concluded in August 2018.

In relation to the allegation Mr Wright had met with abuse survivors, the first complainan­t said they had witnessed him speaking with survivors of CSE at a barbecue for Risky Business.

The second complainan­t, a survivor of CSE, said they spoke to Mr Wright about their experience­s of abuse in Rotherham.

The IOPC report said the second complainan­t had “declined to give a statement in relation to this investigat­ion” to the watchdog.

The IOPC report said the watchdog’s investigat­or had been unable to get hold of a copy of Risky Business signing-in book which Complainan­t A had suggested may have recorded Mr Wright’s attendance because “records have been destroyed or removed”. It added other abuse victims said to have been present at the barbecue had been “unwilling to provide a statement to the IOPC at this time”.

Last year, Mr Wright was among the former senior councillor­s and officers at Rotherham Council criticised for their “miserable silence” after refusing or ignoring requests to participat­e in a series of inquiries ordered by the authority into how abuse victims in the town were failed.

There is insufficie­nt evidence he knew his statement to be false. Referral decision, Independen­t Office for Police Conduct report

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom