Yorkshire Post

Waterman is off track over benefit of HS2

-

From: Christine Daker, Abelton Grove, Haxby, York.

I FEEL compelled to put pen to paper in response to the article printed in your newspaper written by rail enthusiast and record producer Pete Waterman (The Yorkshire Post, February 2).

Mr Waterman waxes lyrical about the benefits that HS2 will bring to the people of Doncaster, all of which would be wonderful but for one significan­t point... there are no plans for HS2 to stop in Doncaster.

For anyone to be able to access HS2 they would have to travel to Sheffield to use the one HS2 train per hour to London.

This, in itself, will take around 85/86 minutes and I fail to see why anyone would choose to do this when they already have up to six trains per hour actually from Doncaster itself to London.

During the constructi­on of HS2 people of Doncaster and surroundin­g area will, however, suffer home and business demolition­s, probably losing money in the process, to say nothing of the emotional upheaval to themselves and their families. There will be traffic chaos and the environmen­tal destructio­n to wildlife, habitat and woodlands will be unpreceden­ted as this unwanted and unnecessar­y rail line carves its way through our beautiful countrysid­e. Little wonder Mr Waterman found that mentioning HS2 only promoted a “lukewarm reaction” from the people of Doncaster.

From: Christine Hill, Parkway, Crofton, Wakefield.

BEFORE Pete Waterman or his associates relocate to Doncaster, please inform him that HS2 does not intend to stop at Doncaster.

In his haste to promote HS2 he fails to check his facts. Rather than halving the travel time from London to Doncaster, as he states, HS2 will have a negative impact on the present rail service in Doncaster.

From: Peter Hyde, Driffield.

I NOTE reports in the national media that Ministers are actively considerin­g scrapping HS2 (The Yorkshire Post, February 12).

This is just one of David Cameron’s follies so why not scrap another such folly? I mean the one about ring-fencing foreign aid. We are struggling to maintain the NHS, police service and our prisons so would it not be better to spend money here before we even consider helping other wasteful nations?

I had always thought the Conservati­ves to be the ‘‘sensible’’ party but now am beginning to have serious doubts about that view.

From: Terry Watson, Adel.

WHEN will Theresa May realise what a disgracefu­l waste of public money HS2 is? The cost has now been estimated by some to top £100bn when finally completed. We do not need HS2 and we cannot afford it, Britain isn’t big enough anyway. Our present pathetic rail system needs billions spending on it.

We need longer platforms and longer trains so that passengers paying the highest fares in Europe can have seats. There seems to be no control of spending on the project with a staff of 1,346, with 46 on more than the £150,000 salary of the Prime Minister, and 15 on £250,000. Time to scrap it, Mrs May.

Margaret Thatcher used to say: “If we can’t afford it , we can’t have it.” I agree.

From: Thomas Reed, Harrogate.

IF HS2 is so beneficial to the North, let building work start here – and not in London. And then we will see whether the Government is serious about delivering high-speed rail for the whole country.

From: Sam Cook, Ilkley.

SO Channel 4’s Despatches programme recognises that we have overcrowde­d trains here. Where have they been – or are they only interested in the North because they’re moving to Leeds?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom