Yorkshire Post

Quest for social justice must be a political priority

- Edward Davies Edward Davies is the policy director of the Centre for Social Justice.

THE CENTRE for Social Justice exists to put social justice at the heart of British politics. As part of that we regularly hold policy discussion­s, dinners and briefings with MPs who are as passionate as we are about the issues we cover.

Over the last couple of years we have hosted politician­s, journalist­s, academics and others to direct conversati­ons, but as the wider Conservati­ve leadership murmurings have increased, so meetings with people like the Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary have come under the public spotlight.

The straightfo­rward reality is that politician­s have an opportunit­y to transform lives, society and our economy by tackling the root causes of poverty: problems like worklessne­ss, family breakdown, educationa­l failure, debt, and addiction. This is because an approach to social justice which changes the lives of the poorest people, benefits everybody.

When families on the margins find stability, work and independen­ce, more adults and children can thrive, more people become net contributo­rs within society and demands on the public purse reduce. We all gain.

It is also a priority for the people of the UK. The electorate is clear that social justice should be the priority of any government. It is the core role of politics.

The CSJ seeks a programme for a government that is passionate about self-reliance but believes in the power of an enabling state. We want people to stand on their own feet but see a role for a thriving social sector. We want to protect the principle of a safety net welfare system, but for those who can work, we say that is the best choice for individual­s, families, and wider society.

We have witnessed some remarkable improvemen­ts in recent decades but over the next few years the Government will have to lead our country through further instabilit­y at home and abroad. It is crucial, therefore, that social justice remains a political priority. And there can be no greater priority.

Though many of the headline figures are historical­ly good, they hide a variation around the country that cannot be ignored. Unemployme­nt is at record lows and our schools are better than ever. But while national employment has reached an alltime high of almost 76 per cent, the figure masks huge regional variation. Similarly, the average wage of the UK hides a reality that only London and the South East sit above the average wage growth, with every other region of the UK lagging behind.

In education, there are more children than ever attending good or outstandin­g–rated schools in the UK. But a child living in one of England’s poorest areas is still 10 times more likely to go to an inadequate-rated school than a child living in one of its richest areas. Similarly, and in part as a consequenc­e, just 44 per cent of disadvanta­ged children get a good pass in English and Maths in GCSEs compared to 71 per cent of their better off peers.

We now have the highest rates of family breakdown in Europe, and in one generation the marriage rate has slumped to half its lowest point in recorded history. Drug-related deaths in the UK have never been higher. And their use in prisons has led to a system in which prisoners are no longer even safe, let alone rehabilita­ted.

Gambling addiction has doubled in a decade, as has rough sleeping, and mental health services are stretched to breaking.

The need for Government action is clear and urgent. Positive headline statistics disguise too many lives lived on the margins of society. And there is no better illustrati­on of this divided country than Brexit.

The story of the referendum was not just one of European policy. The decision to leave the European Union was an unequivoca­l statement for millions of people who want to change the political, economic, and social status quo. It is a huge mistake to think that the vote

The vote to Leave was in no small part a cry of frustratio­n from millions of people.

simply reflected a desire to leave the EU.

The vote to Leave was in no small part a cry of frustratio­n from millions of people who feel that the powers that be in Westminste­r no longer know, or even care, how it feels to walk in their shoes.

The lower your income, the more likely you were to vote leave the EU. The less-well educated voters were more likely to back Leave. The majority of those not in work backed Leave. Those living in social housing mostly backed Leave. Those dependent on a state pension largely backed Leave.

In short, the people with little or nothing to lose from quitting the EU – as they saw it – backed Leave. It would be wrong to make too many sweeping statements about the state of the nation based on that one vote. But it would be far worse to ignore a clear message that underpins it.

When many individual­s and communitie­s feel so alienated, the Government must address ways of rebuilding relationsh­ips in our families, communitie­s, workplaces and beyond. This is the core role of government and the philosophy underpinni­ng the CSJ’s priorities.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom